I have a C# application which manipulates data in a table within a SQL Server database using transactions. The code is very simple and basically goes like this:
public string ConnectionString;
public OleDbConnection DbConnection;
public OleDbTransaction DbTransaction;
// ... some initialization stuff ...
DbTransaction = DbConnection.BeginTransaction();
try
{
// ... some insert/update/delete here ...
DbTransaction.Commit();
}
catch (Exception e)
{
// ...
DbTransaction.Rollback();
}
Now, a situation was reported by a customer, that the table/rowset remained locked, while there was no active application instance running. His first guess was, that an error occurred during the transaction and no try-catch-block with a rollback is there (but this is definitely not the case, since there is a proper error handling). I can reproduce the situation, if I set a break point in the debugger before DbTransaction.Commit();
and then kill the process from Windows Task Manager. Then the transaction remains open (I can see it running DBCC OPENTRAN
) and a lock remains, which prohibits further working with a new instance of the application.
My question: How can I safely handle a situation like this - the process is killed after transaction start and has no chance to commit/rollback the transaction? As far as I know, I cannot recognize, if the application is being killed from the Task Manager ("Process" tab). So can I somehow automatically abort the transaction (e.g. after some timeout) or what else can I do? Please help.
maybe you should
SET XACT_ABORT ON
so the sql server automatically rolls back the current transaction in case of an error.
http://technet.microsoft.com/de-de/library/ms188792.aspx
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With