I'm getting a MemoryError when I try to drop duplicate timestamps on a large dataframe with the following code.
import dask.dataframe as dd
path = f's3://{container_name}/*'
ddf = dd.read_parquet(path, storage_options=opts, engine='fastparquet')
ddf = ddf.reset_index().drop_duplicates(subset='timestamp_utc').set_index('timestamp_utc')
...
Profiling shows that it was using up about 14GB of RAM on a dataset of 265MB of gzipped parquet files containing about 40 million rows of data.
Is there an alternative way I can drop duplicate indexes on my data without Dask using so much memory?
The traceback below
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 193, in _run_module_as_main
"__main__", mod_spec)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/runpy.py", line 85, in _run_code
exec(code, run_globals)
File "/home/chengkai/surbana_lift/src/consolidate_data.py", line 62, in <module>
consolidate_data()
File "/home/chengkai/surbana_lift/src/consolidate_data.py", line 37, in consolidate_data
ddf = ddf.reset_index().drop_duplicates(subset='timestamp_utc').set_index('timestamp_utc')
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/dataframe/core.py", line 2524, in set_index
divisions=divisions, **kwargs)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/dataframe/shuffle.py", line 64, in set_index
divisions, sizes, mins, maxes = base.compute(divisions, sizes, mins, maxes)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/base.py", line 407, in compute
results = get(dsk, keys, **kwargs)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/threaded.py", line 75, in get
pack_exception=pack_exception, **kwargs)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 521, in get_async
raise_exception(exc, tb)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/compatibility.py", line 67, in reraise
raise exc
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 290, in execute_task
result = _execute_task(task, data)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 270, in _execute_task
args2 = [_execute_task(a, cache) for a in args]
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 270, in <listcomp>
args2 = [_execute_task(a, cache) for a in args]
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 267, in _execute_task
return [_execute_task(a, cache) for a in arg]
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 267, in <listcomp>
return [_execute_task(a, cache) for a in arg]
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/local.py", line 271, in _execute_task
return func(*args2)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/dataframe/core.py", line 69, in _concat
return args[0] if not args2 else methods.concat(args2, uniform=True)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/dataframe/methods.py", line 329, in concat
out = pd.concat(dfs3, join=join)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/reshape/concat.py", line 226, in concat
return op.get_result()
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/reshape/concat.py", line 423, in get_result
copy=self.copy)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/internals.py", line 5418, in concatenate_block_manage
rs
[ju.block for ju in join_units], placement=placement)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/internals.py", line 2984, in concat_same_type
axis=self.ndim - 1)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/dtypes/concat.py", line 461, in _concat_datetime
return _concat_datetimetz(to_concat)
File "/anaconda/envs/surb/lib/python3.6/site-packages/pandas/core/dtypes/concat.py", line 506, in _concat_datetimetz
new_values = np.concatenate([x.asi8 for x in to_concat])
MemoryError
It is not too surprising that the data becomes very big in memory. Parquet is a pretty efficient format in terms of space, especially with gzip compression, and strings all become python objects (so expensive in memory).
In addition, you have a number of worker threads operating on parts of the overall dataframe. That involves data copying, intermediates, and concatenation of results; the latter being pretty inefficient in pandas.
One suggestion: instead of reset_index, you can remove one step by specifying index=False to read_parquet.
Next suggestion: limit the number of threads you use to a smaller number than the default, which is probably your number of CPU cores. The easiest way to do that is to use the distributed client in-process
from dask.distributed import Client
c = Client(processes=False, threads_per_worker=4)
It may be better to set the index first, and then do the drop_duplicated with map_partitions to minimise cross-partition communication.
df.map_partitions(lambda d: d.drop_duplicates(subset='timestamp_utc'))
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With