Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Custom Collection Initializers

Tags:

c#

Classes that implement IEnumerable and provide a public void Add(/* args */) function can be initialized like in the following example:

List<int> numbers = new List<int>{ 1, 2, 3 };

which calls the Add(int) function 3x after initializing the List<int>.

Is there a way to define this behavior explicitly for my own classes? For example, could I have the initializer call a function other than the appropriate Add() overload?

like image 282
Jake Avatar asked Mar 22 '10 21:03

Jake


People also ask

What is collection initializers in C#?

Collection initializers let you specify one or more element initializers when you initialize a collection type that implements IEnumerable and has Add with the appropriate signature as an instance method or an extension method. The element initializers can be a simple value, an expression, or an object initializer.

How are Initializers executed C#?

Initializers execute before the base class constructor for your type executes, and they are executed in the order in which the variables are declared in your class. Using initializers is the simplest way to avoid uninitialized variables in your types, but it's not perfect.

What is object initializer?

An object initializer is an expression that describes the initialization of an Object . Objects consist of properties, which are used to describe an object. The values of object properties can either contain primitive data types or other objects.

What is an object in C# with example?

Everything in C# is associated with classes and objects, along with its attributes and methods. For example: in real life, a car is an object. The car has attributes, such as weight and color, and methods, such as drive and brake. A Class is like an object constructor, or a "blueprint" for creating objects.


2 Answers

No, the compiler requires a method named Add for the collection initializer to work. This is defined in C# specification and cannot be changed:

C# Language Specification - 7.5.10.3 Collection Initializers

The collection object to which a collection initializer is applied must be of a type that implements System.Collections.IEnumerable or a compile-time error occurs. For each specified element in order, the collection initializer invokes an Add method on the target object with the expression list of the element initializer as argument list, applying normal overload resolution for each invocation. Thus, the collection object must contain an applicable Add method for each element initializer. [emphasis mine]

Of course, the Add method can take more than one argument (like Dictionary<TKey, TValue>):

dic = new Dictionary<int, int> {      { 1, 2 },     { 3, 4 } }; // translated to: dic = new Dictionary<int, int>(); dic.Add(1, 2); dic.Add(3, 4); 
like image 146
mmx Avatar answered Sep 22 '22 14:09

mmx


Adding just as a sample answer of what works. AFAIK, only Add will work. Code snippet taken from Marius Schulz

// simple struct which represents a point in three-dimensional space public struct Point3D {     public readonly double X;     public readonly double Y;     public readonly double Z;      public Point3D(double x, double y, double z)     {         X = x;         Y = y;         Z = z;     } }  // implementation of a collection of points, which respects // the compiler convention for collection initializers and // therefore both implements IEnumerable<T> and provides // a public Add method public class Points : IEnumerable<Point3D> {     private readonly List<Point3D> _points;      public Points()     {         _points = new List<Point3D>();     }      public void Add(double x, double y, double z)     {         _points.Add(new Point3D(x, y, z));     }      public IEnumerator<Point3D> GetEnumerator()     {         return _points.GetEnumerator();     }      IEnumerator IEnumerable.GetEnumerator()     {         return GetEnumerator();     } }  // instantiate the Points class and fill it with values like this: var cube = new Points {     { -1, -1, -1 },     { -1, -1,  1 },     { -1,  1, -1 },     { -1,  1,  1 },     {  1, -1, -1 },     {  1, -1,  1 },     {  1,  1, -1 },     {  1,  1,  1 } }; 
like image 41
dizarter Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 14:09

dizarter