Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

CUDA program causes nvidia driver to crash

My monte carlo pi calculation CUDA program is causing my nvidia driver to crash when I exceed around 500 trials and 256 full blocks. It seems to be happening in the monteCarlo kernel function.Any help is appreciated.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <cuda.h>
#include <curand.h>
#include <curand_kernel.h>


#define NUM_THREAD 256
#define NUM_BLOCK 256



///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

// Function to sum an array
__global__ void reduce0(float *g_odata) {
extern __shared__ int sdata[];

// each thread loads one element from global to shared mem
unsigned int tid = threadIdx.x;
unsigned int i = blockIdx.x*blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
sdata[tid] = g_odata[i];
__syncthreads();

// do reduction in shared mem
for (unsigned int s=1; s < blockDim.x; s *= 2) { // step = s x 2
    if (tid % (2*s) == 0) { // only threadIDs divisible by the step participate
        sdata[tid] += sdata[tid + s];
    }
    __syncthreads();
}

// write result for this block to global mem
if (tid == 0) g_odata[blockIdx.x] = sdata[0];
}

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
__global__ void monteCarlo(float *g_odata, int  trials, curandState *states){
//  unsigned int tid = threadIdx.x;
    unsigned int i = blockIdx.x*blockDim.x + threadIdx.x;
    unsigned int incircle, k;
    float x, y, z;
    incircle = 0;

    curand_init(1234, i, 0, &states[i]);

    for(k = 0; k < trials; k++){
        x = curand_uniform(&states[i]);
        y = curand_uniform(&states[i]);
        z =(x*x + y*y);
        if (z <= 1.0f) incircle++;
    }
    __syncthreads();
    g_odata[i] = incircle;
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
int main() {

    float* solution = (float*)calloc(100, sizeof(float));
    float *sumDev, *sumHost, total;
    const char *error;
    int trials; 
    curandState *devStates;

    trials = 500;
    total = trials*NUM_THREAD*NUM_BLOCK;

    dim3 dimGrid(NUM_BLOCK,1,1); // Grid dimensions
    dim3 dimBlock(NUM_THREAD,1,1); // Block dimensions
    size_t size = NUM_BLOCK*NUM_THREAD*sizeof(float); //Array memory size
    sumHost = (float*)calloc(NUM_BLOCK*NUM_THREAD, sizeof(float));

    cudaMalloc((void **) &sumDev, size); // Allocate array on device
    error = cudaGetErrorString(cudaGetLastError());
    printf("%s\n", error);


    cudaMalloc((void **) &devStates, (NUM_THREAD*NUM_BLOCK)*sizeof(curandState));
    error = cudaGetErrorString(cudaGetLastError());
    printf("%s\n", error);


    // Do calculation on device by calling CUDA kernel
    monteCarlo <<<dimGrid, dimBlock>>> (sumDev, trials, devStates);
    error = cudaGetErrorString(cudaGetLastError());
    printf("%s\n", error);

        // call reduction function to sum
    reduce0 <<<dimGrid, dimBlock, (NUM_THREAD*sizeof(float))>>> (sumDev);
    error = cudaGetErrorString(cudaGetLastError());
    printf("%s\n", error);

    dim3 dimGrid1(1,1,1);
    dim3 dimBlock1(256,1,1);
    reduce0 <<<dimGrid1, dimBlock1, (NUM_THREAD*sizeof(float))>>> (sumDev);
    error = cudaGetErrorString(cudaGetLastError());
    printf("%s\n", error);

    // Retrieve result from device and store it in host array
    cudaMemcpy(sumHost, sumDev, sizeof(float), cudaMemcpyDeviceToHost);
    error = cudaGetErrorString(cudaGetLastError());
    printf("%s\n", error);


    *solution = 4*(sumHost[0]/total);
    printf("%.*f\n", 1000, *solution);
    free (solution);
    free(sumHost);
    cudaFree(sumDev);
    cudaFree(devStates);
    //*solution = NULL;
    return 0;
}
like image 294
zetatr Avatar asked Dec 09 '22 08:12

zetatr


2 Answers

If smaller numbers of trials work correctly, and if you are running on MS Windows without the NVIDIA Tesla Compute Cluster (TCC) driver and/or the GPU you are using is attached to a display, then you are probably exceeding the operating system's "watchdog" timeout. If the kernel occupies the display device (or any GPU on Windows without TCC) for too long, the OS will kill the kernel so that the system does not become non-interactive.

The solution is to run on a non-display-attached GPU and if you are on Windows, use the TCC driver. Otherwise, you will need to reduce the number of trials in your kernel and run the kernel multiple times to compute the number of trials you need.

EDIT: According to the CUDA 4.0 curand docs(page 15, "Performance Notes"), you can improve performance by copying the state for a generator to local storage inside your kernel, then storing the state back (if you need it again) when you are finished:

curandState state = states[i];

for(k = 0; k < trials; k++){
    x = curand_uniform(&state);
    y = curand_uniform(&state);
    z =(x*x + y*y);
    if (z <= 1.0f) incircle++;
}

Next, it mentions that setup is expensive, and suggests that you move curand_init into a separate kernel. This may help keep the cost of your MC kernel down so you don't run up against the watchdog.

I recommend reading that section of the docs, there are several useful guidelines.

like image 94
harrism Avatar answered Dec 25 '22 21:12

harrism


For those of you having a geforce GPU which does not support TCC driver there is another solution based on:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/hardware/ff569918(v=vs.85).aspx

  1. start regedit,
  2. navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\CurrentControlSet\Control\GraphicsDrivers
  3. create new DWORD key called TdrLevel, set value to 0,
  4. restart PC.

Now your long-running kernels should not be terminated. This answer is based on:

Modifying registry to increase GPU timeout, windows 7

I just thought it might be useful to provide the solution here as well.

like image 42
Michal Hosala Avatar answered Dec 25 '22 23:12

Michal Hosala