My question should be pretty strait forward. For some reason I can't wrap my head around it today.
I'm making a menu with a structure like so
<div class="wrapper">
<ul>
<li class="menu-item"><a href="#">Menu Item</a>
<div class="inner">
<a href="#">Login</a>
</div>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
I am trying to target the login link using the following css selector:
.inner a{}
The selector is working, however the following selector is taking css presidence, and overriding the above selector:
li.menu-item a{}
I'm totally baffled. Why would the second selector take style preference over the first? How would you guys recommend I target the above "a" elements?
Why would the second selector take style preference over the first?
Because the second selector is more specific than the first. The first contains one class and one type selector while the second has one class and two type selectors.
To calculate specificity, think of an selector as consiting of four numbers, all starting at (0,0,0,0)
:not()
) and attribute selectors count as the third number (0,0,1,0)
div {}
or ::after{}
count as the fourth (0,0,0,1)
Also:
*
has no effect on a selectors specificity.+
, ~
and >
also have no effect on specificity.!important
rules almost always take precedence; though they don't affect the four numbers associated with a selectors specificity. Only another !important
rule can override a previously defined one. The exception is when the previously defined !important
rule has a more specific selector. Here, the normal rule of specificity (described above) apply.If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With