I've been having an issue with using offsetWidth across different browsers. This difference in results is causing some strange layouts. I've created a very small example that displays what I'm seeing.
jsbin
HTML
<table id="tbl">
<tr>
<td>Cell 1</td>
<td>Cell 2</td>
</tr>
</table>
<button onclick="calc()">Calculate Offset Width</button>
<div>Cell 1 offsetWidth: <span id="c1offWidth"></span></div>
js
function calc(){
document.getElementById('c1offWidth').innerHTML =
document.getElementById('tbl').children[0].children[0].offsetWidth;
}
CSS
Erik Meyer's Reset CSS
When I run this on chrome, safari, and opera the value returned for Cell 1's offset width is 72. When I run this on firefox and IE9-10 the value returned is 77.
I was under the impression this was the best way to calculate the width of an element including padding and border.
Is there a cross browser solution that will always return the same result? I tried using jQuery but the results were even more confusing.
EDIT Because everyone is recommending outerWidth I made a jsbin for that also. The results still differ across browsers. Chrome returns 36; IE9-10 and Firefox return 39.
jsbin updated
offsetWidth , offsetHeight : The size of the visual box incuding all borders. Can be calculated by adding width / height and paddings and borders, if the element has display: block. clientWidth , clientHeight : The visual portion of the box content, not including borders or scroll bars , but includes padding .
Typically, offsetWidth is a measurement in pixels of the element's CSS width, including any borders, padding, and vertical scrollbars (if rendered). It does not include the width of pseudo-elements such as ::before or ::after . If the element is hidden (for example, by setting style.
To measure the width of a div element we will utilize the offsetWidth property of JavaScript. This property of JavaScript returns an integer representing the layout width of an element and is measured in pixels. Return Value: Returns the corresponding element's layout pixel width.
To find the width and height of an element, width() and height() methods are used. The width() method is used to check the width of an element. It does not check the padding, border and margin of the element.
Since you tagged the post with jQuery, I assume that a jQuery solution is acceptable. What's wrong with outerWidth()
?
For example:
function calc()
{
var the_width = $('#tbl tr:eq(0) td:eq(0)').outerWidth();
$('#c1offWidth').html(the_width);
}
Using jQuery brings a number of advantages to the table (as you can see by the reduced amount of code needed above). You should also consider using non-intrusive event handlers, too. For example, remove the onclick
attribute from your button
, and do this:
$(function() {
$('button').click(function() {
var the_width = $('#tbl tr:eq(0) td:eq(0)').outerWidth();
$('#c1offWidth').html(the_width);
});
});
Please see the jsFiddle demo.
The actual problem in your example was in that different browsers use different default fonts for rendering. And box-sizing for your cells is defined by content. If you set definite width for the element (as correctly stated in one of the comment) you'll get the definite and equal result.
ps: can't post comments...
offsetWidth
is not reliable cross-browser. I would recommend using jQuery's outerWidth()
instead.
$("#your-element").outerWidth();
See DEMO.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With