cronjob vs daemon in linux. When to use? [closed]

Question

There are advantages making a process daemonized, as it it detached from the terminal. But the same thing also can be achieved by cron job as well. [ Kindly correct me if not ]

What is the best requirement with which i can differentiate the scenarios when to use cronjob or daemon process?

Answer 1

In general, if your task needs to run more than a few times per hour (maybe <10 minutes) you probably want to run a daemon.

A daemon which is always running, has the following benefits:

• It can run at frequencies greater than 1 per minute
• It can remember state from its previous run more easily, which makes programming simpler (if you need to remember state) and can improve efficiency in some cases
• On an infrastructure with many hosts, it does not cause a "stampedeing herd" effect
• Multiple invocations can be avoided more easily (perhaps?)

BUT

• If it quits (e.g. following an error), it won't automatically be restarted unless you implemented that feature
• It uses memory even when not doing anything useful
• Memory leaks are more of a problem.

In general, robustness favours "cron", and performance favours a daemon. But there is a lot of overlap (where either would be ok) and counter-examples. It depends on your exact scenario.

Answer 2

The difference between a cronjob and a daemon is the execution time frame.

A cronjob is a proccess that is executed once in a while. An example of cronjob could be a script that remove the content of a temporary folder once in a while, or a program that sends push notifications every day at 9.00 am to a bunch of devices.

Whereas a daemon is a process running detached from any user, but wont be re-launch if it comes to end.