Given a primitive value age
I know how to create an expression like this:
//assuming: age is an int or some other primitive type
employee => employee.Age == age
By doing this:
var entityType = typeof(Employee);
var propertyName = "Age";
int age = 30;
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(entityType, "entity");
var lambda = Expression.Lambda(
Expression.Equal(
Expression.Property(parameter, propertyName),
Expression.Constant(age)
)
, parameter);
That works fine except in scenarios where the property and constant in question are not primitive types.
How would I construct a similar expression if the comparison is between objects?
With EF I can just write:
Location location = GetCurrentLocation();
employees = DataContext.Employees.Where(e => e.Location == location);
That also works, but if I try to create the same expression:
var entityType = typeof(Employee);
var propertyName = "Location";
var location = GetCurrentLocation();
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(entityType, "entity");
var lambda = Expression.Lambda(
Expression.Equal(
Expression.Property(parameter, propertyName),
Expression.Constant(location)
)
, parameter);
I get an error that says:
Unable to create a constant value of type 'Location'. Only primitive types or enumeration types are supported in this context.
My suspicion is that Expression.Constant()
only expects primitive types, so I need to use a different expression factory method. (maype Expression.Object
? - I know that doesn't exist)
Is there a way to create an expression that compares objects? Why is that EF is able to interpret it correctly if its a compiled LINQ statement, but not when it is an expression?
In addition to what has been mentioned in previous answers. A more specific solution would go as such:
public static Expression CreateExpression<T>(string propertyName, object valueToCompare)
{
// get the type of entity
var entityType = typeof(T);
// get the type of the value object
var valueType = valueToCompare.GetType();
var entityProperty = entityType.GetProperty(propertyName);
var propertyType = entityProperty.PropertyType;
// Expression: "entity"
var parameter = Expression.Parameter(entityType, "entity");
// check if the property type is a value type
// only value types work
if (propertyType.IsValueType || propertyType.Equals(typeof(string)))
{
// Expression: entity.Property == value
return Expression.Equal(
Expression.Property(parameter, entityProperty),
Expression.Constant(valueToCompare)
);
}
// if not, then use the key
else
{
// get the key property
var keyProperty = propertyType.GetProperties().FirstOrDefault(p => p.GetCustomAttributes(typeof(KeyAttribute), false).Length > 0);
// Expression: entity.Property.Key == value.Key
return Expression.Equal(
Expression.Property(
Expression.Property(parameter, entityProperty),
keyProperty
),
Expression.Constant(
keyProperty.GetValue(valueToCompare),
keyProperty.PropertyType
)
);
}
}
IMPORTANT POINTS :
propertyType
and valueType
are compatible (either they are the same type or are convertible)KeyAttribute
)Hope that helps.
You can't do that because EF doesn't know how to translate equality comparisons on Location
into a SQL expression.
However, if you know what properties of Location
you want to compare, you can do this with anonymous types:
var location = GetCurrentLocation();
var locationObj = new { location.LocationName, location.LocationDescription };
employees = DataContext.Employees.Where(e => new { e.Location.LocationName, e.Location.Description } == locationObj);
Of course that's equivalent to:
var location = GetCurrentLocation();
employees = DataContext.Employees.Where(e => e.Location.LocationName == location.Name &&
e.Location.Description == location.Description);
Give the code below a run. I wanted to test your assumption that e => e.Location == location is compiling into something that can be constructed with Expression.Equal, Expression.Property, and Expression.Constant.
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
var location = new Location();
Expression<Func<Employee, bool>> expression = e => e.Location == location;
var untypedBody = expression.Body;
//The untyped body is a BinaryExpression
Debug.Assert(
typeof(BinaryExpression).IsAssignableFrom(untypedBody.GetType()),
"Not Expression.Equal");
var body = (BinaryExpression)untypedBody;
var untypedLeft = body.Left;
var untypedRight = body.Right;
//The untyped left expression is a MemberExpression
Debug.Assert(
typeof(MemberExpression).IsAssignableFrom(untypedLeft.GetType()),
"Not Expression.Property");
////The untyped right expression is a ConstantExpression
//Debug.Assert(
// typeof(ConstantExpression).IsAssignableFrom(untypedRight.GetType()),
// "Not Expression.Constant");
//The untyped right expression is a MemberExpression?
Debug.Assert(
typeof(MemberExpression).IsAssignableFrom(untypedRight.GetType())));
}
}
public class Employee
{
public Location Location { get; set; }
}
public class Location { }
It seems like it isn't, and its because the right expression isn't a Constant. To see this, uncomment the commented out code.
What I don't understand is why the right expression is a MemberExpression. Perhaps someone who knows the linq expression compiler can shed more light onto this then I can.
Edit: This may have to do with closure in lambdas - a class is created behind the scenes which contains the closed over variables. The location might then be a member of that class. I'm not sure about this, but it's what I suspect.
This post may shed additional light on the situation.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With