I've run across this code in a number of places:
DEFINE BUFFER Customer FOR Customer.
I have two questions:
What is the purpose of this? Why is it beneficial to create a buffer with the same name as the table?
When writing code to access this table/buffer, how does Progress know whether to access the DB directly or through the buffer?
1: It's usually done to manage the scope of the buffers.
If you have, for example, a procedure with a number of internal procedures which all access the same table, then the default buffer for that table will end up scoped to the top level procedure block. For example -
procedure p1:
find first customer no-lock.
end.
procedure p2:
find last customer no-lock.
end.
would end up scoping the customer buffer to the containing procedure. If you're trying to keep your internal procedures loosely coupled and self contained, then you might not want this behaviour. So you'd define a buffer within each of the internal procedures.
Obv there are other reasons to define buffers, but when you see code that defines a buffer with the same name as the table, it's usually about scope.
2: It always access the DB through a buffer. Every table has a default buffer with the same name as the table, so
find first <buffername>.
will look for a buffer named buffername which may be an explicitly defined buffer or an implicit default buffer. Precedence will go to an explicitly defined buffer if one exists.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With