There are two different ways to create an empty object in JavaScript:
var objectA = {} var objectB = new Object()
Is there any difference in how the script engine handles them? Is there any reason to use one over the other?
Similarly it is also possible to create an empty array using different syntax:
var arrayA = [] var arrayB = new Array()
There is no benefit to using new Object();
- whereas {};
can make your code more compact, and more readable.
For defining empty objects they're technically the same. The {}
syntax is shorter, neater (less Java-ish), and allows you to instantly populate the object inline - like so:
var myObject = { title: 'Frog', url: '/img/picture.jpg', width: 300, height: 200 };
For arrays, there's similarly almost no benefit to ever using new Array();
over [];
- with one minor exception:
var emptyArray = new Array(100);
creates a 100 item long array with all slots containing undefined
- which may be nice/useful in certain situations (such as (new Array(9)).join('Na-Na ') + 'Batman!'
).
new Object();
- it's clunkier than {};
and looks silly.[];
- except when you need to quickly create an "empty" array with a predefined length.If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With