I have matrix
A=[2 3 4 5 6 7;
7 6 5 4 3 2]
I want to count how many number of elements have a value greater than 3 and less than 6.
flatA = A(:);
count = sum(flatA > 3 & flatA < 6);
I can think of a few ways:
count = numel(A( A(:)>3 & A(:)<6 )) %# (1)
count = length(A( A(:)>3 & A(:)<6 )) %# (2)
count = nnz( A(:)>3 & A(:)<6 ) %# (3)
count = sum( A(:)>3 & A(:)<6 ) %# (4)
Ac = A(:);
count = numel(A( Ac>3 & Ac<6 )) %# (5,6,7,8)
%# prevents double expansion
%# similar for length(), nnz(), sum(),
%# in the same order as (1)-(4)
count = numel(A( abs(A-(6+3)/2)<3/2 )) %# (9,10,11,12)
%# prevents double comparison and &
%# similar for length(), nnz(), sum()
%# in the same order as (1)-(4)
So, let's test what the fastest way is. Test code:
A = randi(10, 50);
tic
for ii = 1:1e5
%# method is inserted here
end
toc
results (best of 5 runs, all in seconds):
%# ( 1): 2.981446
%# ( 2): 3.006602
%# ( 3): 3.077083
%# ( 4): 2.619057
%# ( 5): 3.011029
%# ( 6): 2.868021
%# ( 7): 3.149641
%# ( 8): 2.457988
%# ( 9): 1.675575
%# (10): 1.675384
%# (11): 2.442607
%# (12): 1.222510
So it seems that count = sum(( abs(A(:)-(6+3)/2)<3/2 ));
is the best way to go here.
On a personal note: I did not expect comparison to be slower than arithmetic in Matlab -- does anyone know an explanation for this?
Plus: why is nnz
so slow compared to sum
? I guess that makes sense now that I know comparison is slower than arithmetic...
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With