The following cross-origin POST request, with a content-type of multipart/form-data and only simple headers is preflighted. According to the W3C spec, unless I am reading it wrong, it should not be preflighted. I've confirmed this happens in Chrome 27 and Firefox 10.8.3. I haven't tested any other browsers.
Here are the request headers, etc:
Request URL:http://192.168.130.135:8081/upload/receiver
Request Method:POST
Status Code:200 OK
Request Headersview source
Accept:*/*
Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.8
Connection:keep-alive
Content-Length:27129
Content-Type:multipart/form-data; boundary=----WebKitFormBoundaryix5VzTyVtCMwcNv6
Host:192.168.130.135:8081
Origin:http://192.168.130.135:8080
Referer:http://192.168.130.135:8080/test/raytest-jquery.html
User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.37 Safari/537.36
And here is the OPTIONS (preflight) request:
Request URL:http://192.168.130.135:8081/upload/receiver
Request Method:OPTIONS
Status Code:200 OK
Request Headersview source
Accept:*/*
Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflate,sdch
Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.8
Access-Control-Request-Headers:origin, content-type
Access-Control-Request-Method:POST
Connection:keep-alive
Host:192.168.130.135:8081
Origin:http://192.168.130.135:8080
Referer:http://192.168.130.135:8080/test/raytest-jquery.html
User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_3) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/28.0.1500.37 Safari/537.36
The spec seems pretty clear:
UPDATE: Here's some simple client-side code that will reproduce this:
var xhr = new XMLHttpRequest(),
formData = new FormData();
formData.append('myfile', someFileObj);
xhr.upload.progress = function(e) {
//insert upload progress logic here
};
xhr.open('POST', 'http://192.168.130.135:8080/upload/receiver', true);
xhr.send(formData);
Does anyone know why this is being preflighted?
I ended up checking out the Webkit source code in an attempt to figure this out (after Google did not yield any helpful hits). It turns out that Webkit will force any cross-origin request to be preflighted simply if you register an onprogress
event handler. I'm not entirely sure, even after reading the code comments, why this logic was applied.
In XMLHttpRequest.cpp:
void XMLHttpRequest::createRequest(ExceptionCode& ec)
{
...
options.preflightPolicy = uploadEvents ? ForcePreflight : ConsiderPreflight;
...
// The presence of upload event listeners forces us to use preflighting because POSTing to an URL that does not
// permit cross origin requests should look exactly like POSTing to an URL that does not respond at all.
// Also, only async requests support upload progress events.
bool uploadEvents = false;
if (m_async) {
m_progressEventThrottle.dispatchEvent(XMLHttpRequestProgressEvent::create(eventNames().loadstartEvent));
if (m_requestEntityBody && m_upload) {
uploadEvents = m_upload->hasEventListeners();
m_upload->dispatchEvent(XMLHttpRequestProgressEvent::create(eventNames().loadstartEvent));
}
}
...
}
UPDATE: Firefox applies the same logic as Webkit, it appears. Here is the relevant code from nsXMLHttpRequest.cpp:
nsresult
nsXMLHttpRequest::CheckChannelForCrossSiteRequest(nsIChannel* aChannel)
{
...
// Check if we need to do a preflight request.
nsCOMPtr<nsIHttpChannel> httpChannel = do_QueryInterface(aChannel);
NS_ENSURE_TRUE(httpChannel, NS_ERROR_DOM_BAD_URI);
nsAutoCString method;
httpChannel->GetRequestMethod(method);
if (!mCORSUnsafeHeaders.IsEmpty() ||
(mUpload && mUpload->HasListeners()) ||
(!method.LowerCaseEqualsLiteral("get") &&
!method.LowerCaseEqualsLiteral("post") &&
!method.LowerCaseEqualsLiteral("head"))) {
mState |= XML_HTTP_REQUEST_NEED_AC_PREFLIGHT;
}
...
}
Notice the mUpload && mUpload->HasListeners()
portion of the conditional.
Seems like Webkit and Firefox (and possibly others) have inserted some logic into their preflight-determination code that is not sanctioned by the W3C spec. If I'm missing something in the spec, please comment.
My guess is that the "boundary" on the Content-Type
header is causing issues. If you are able to reproduce this, it should be filed as a browser bug, since the spec states that the Content-Type
header check should exclude parameters.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With