I am currently working on a Windows 8 app which needs to store some tables. Currently, I am using XML files with XDocument classes to solve the purpose. It employs save
and load
methods using GetFileAsync
and CreateFileAsync
etc. Moreover, there save
and load
methods are called by different events. However, whenever there are repeated calls, an exception is thrown telling me that file access is denied. Expected behavior - more details here! While there are dirty methods to avoid this (like using locks and such) I am not very happy with the results. I'd rather prefer databases. Moreover, I am planning to write another app for Windows Phone 8 (and possibly a web version) which will make use of the data.
They have been repeatedly saying that Windows 8 is cloud based. Now the question: What is correct way to store my data? XML seems right but is has problems I mentioned above. What would be ideal cloud based solution involving Windows 8, Windows Phone 8 and possibly Azure? All I want is to store tables and make those accessible.
Sorry if the question seems unclear. I will provide information if required.
If you want to use Azure, the easiest way to proceed is Windows Azure Mobile services. It allows you to setup your database and webservices using a web interface in a few minutes.
It's quite cool, allows you to add custom javascript to your web api logic, and generates json web apis. There are client Libraries for Windows 8, Windows Phone and iOS. You could easily roll your own for any http enabled frontends.
However be aware that taking the cloud route means that your app won't work offline, (if you don't code a cache system that is. And a cache will requires a local DB.)
About the local DB You really have to possibilities: 1) A real DB in your app, like SQLite. It's available as a Nuget package but right now ARM support isn't available out of the box, nor guaranteed by the team. If you don't need arm, Go try it :)
2) plain old file storage, like you did before. I personally often do that myself. You will however get issues when accessing it from different threads (Access Denied errors).
When you store things in a local file, don't forget to lock the critical sections (ie when you read or write to the file) to prevent the access denied exceptions. To be sure, Incapsulate your write/read logic in a service class instance unique within your app. (Use the singleton pattern for instance, or anything equivalent).
The lock itself, now. I imagine that you are using async await. I like this sweet thing too. But classic C# locks (using the lock
keyword for instance) don't work with async await. (And even if it worked, blocking wouldn't be cool).
That's why the marvellous AsyncLock comes into play. It's a lock, but which -approximately- doesn't block (you await it).
public class AsyncLock
{
private readonly AsyncSemaphore m_semaphore;
private readonly Task<Releaser> m_releaser;
public AsyncLock()
{
m_semaphore = new AsyncSemaphore(1);
m_releaser = Task.FromResult(new Releaser(this));
}
public Task<Releaser> LockAsync()
{
var wait = m_semaphore.WaitAsync();
return wait.IsCompleted ?
m_releaser :
wait.ContinueWith((_, state) => new Releaser((AsyncLock)state),
this, CancellationToken.None,
TaskContinuationOptions.ExecuteSynchronously, TaskScheduler.Default);
}
public struct Releaser : IDisposable
{
private readonly AsyncLock m_toRelease;
internal Releaser(AsyncLock toRelease) { m_toRelease = toRelease; }
public void Dispose()
{
if (m_toRelease != null)
m_toRelease.m_semaphore.Release();
}
}
}
public class AsyncSemaphore
{
private readonly static Task s_completed = Task.FromResult(true);
private readonly Queue<TaskCompletionSource<bool>> m_waiters = new Queue<TaskCompletionSource<bool>>();
private int m_currentCount;
public AsyncSemaphore(int initialCount)
{
if (initialCount < 0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException("initialCount");
m_currentCount = initialCount;
}
public Task WaitAsync()
{
lock (m_waiters)
{
if (m_currentCount > 0)
{
--m_currentCount;
return s_completed;
}
else
{
var waiter = new TaskCompletionSource<bool>();
m_waiters.Enqueue(waiter);
return waiter.Task;
}
}
}
public void Release()
{
TaskCompletionSource<bool> toRelease = null;
lock (m_waiters)
{
if (m_waiters.Count > 0)
toRelease = m_waiters.Dequeue();
else
++m_currentCount;
}
if (toRelease != null)
toRelease.SetResult(true);
}
}
you can use it this way (I suppose that you have an AsyncLock field named blogLock (taken from one of my own projects):
using (await blogLock.LockAsync())
{
using (var stream = await folder.OpenStreamForReadAsync(_blogFileName))
{
using (var reader = new StreamReader(stream))
{
var json = await reader.ReadToEndAsync();
var blog = await JsonConvert.DeserializeObjectAsync<Blog>(json);
return blog;
}
}
}
I've stumbled across this thread because I have basically the exact same problem. What seems staggering to me is that Microsoft makes its own enterprise-class database product (SQL Server), which already has a couple of lightweight, embeddable versions, and yet these seemingly can't be used with Windows 8/Windows Phone 8 applications to provide a local database. And yet MySQL can!
I've tried a couple of times to dabble in writing Windows Phone 8 apps, using my ASP.NET/VB/NET/SQL experience, but I always get bogged down in trying to learn a different way to perform data operations that I can do in my sleep in a web environment and lose interest. Why can't they make it easy to use SQL with W8/WP8 apps?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With