How do I convert an unsigned integer (representing a user ID) to a random looking but actually a deterministically repeatable choice? The choice must be selected with equal probability (irrespective of the distribution of the the input integers). For example, if I have 3 choices, i.e. [0, 1, 2]
, the user ID 123 may always be randomly assigned choice 2, whereas the user ID 234 may always be assigned choice 1.
Cross-language and cross-platform algorithmic reproducibility is desirable. I'm inclined to use a hash function and modulo unless there is a better way. Here is what I have:
>>> num_choices = 3
>>> id_num = 123
>>> int(hashlib.sha256(str(id_num).encode()).hexdigest(), 16) % num_choices
2
I'm using the latest stable Python 3. Please note that this question is similar but not exactly identical to the related question to convert a string to random but deterministically repeatable uniform probability.
import hashlib
def id_to_choice(id_num, num_choices):
id_bytes = id_num.to_bytes((id_num.bit_length() + 7) // 8, 'big')
id_hash = hashlib.sha512(id_bytes)
id_hash_int = int.from_bytes(id_hash.digest(), 'big') # Uses explicit byteorder for system-agnostic reproducibility
choice = id_hash_int % num_choices # Use with small num_choices only
return choice
>>> id_to_choice(123, 3)
0
>>> id_to_choice(456, 3)
1
Notes:
The built-in
hash
method must not be used because it can preserve the input's
distribution, e.g. with hash(123)
. Alternatively, it can return values that differ when Python is restarted, e.g. with hash('123')
.
For converting an int to bytes, bytes(id_num)
works but is grossly inefficient as it returns an array of null bytes, and so it must not be used. Using int.to_bytes
is better. Using str(id_num).encode()
works but wastes a few bytes.
Admittedly, using modulo doesn't offer exactly uniform probability,[1][2] but this shouldn't bias much for this application because id_hash_int
is expected to be very large and num_choices
is assumed to be small.
The random
module can be used with id_num
as its seed, while addressing concerns surrounding both thread safety and continuity. Using randrange
in this manner is comparable to and simpler than hashing the seed and taking modulo.
With this approach, not only is cross-language reproducibility a concern, but reproducibility across multiple future versions of Python could also be a concern. It is therefore not recommended.
import random
def id_to_choice(id_num, num_choices):
localrandom = random.Random(id_num)
choice = localrandom.randrange(num_choices)
return choice
>>> id_to_choice(123, 3)
0
>>> id_to_choice(456, 3)
2
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With