I am using OpenCV and also want to add some of cool functions from mlpack, which is using Armadillo matrices.
Is there an easy way to convet between cv::Mat and arms::mat?
Thanks!
OpenCV's Mat
has a pointer to its data. Armadillo has a constructor that is capable of reading from external data. It's easy to put them together. Remember that Armadillo stores in column-major order, whereas OpenCV uses row-major. I suppose you'll need to add another step for transformation, before or after.
cv::Mat opencv_mat; //opencv's mat, already transposed.
arma::mat arma_mat( reinterpret_cast<double*>opencv_mat.data, opencv_mat.rows, opencv_mat.cols )
The cv::Mat
constructor has a form that accepts pointer to data, and arma::mat
has a function for a double* pointer to its data called memptr().
So, if you'd like to convert from arma::mat
to cv::Mat
, this should work:
cv::Mat opencv_mat( rows, cols, CV_64FC1, arma_mat.memptr() )
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With