I understand that I can use combine_first
to merge two series:
series1 = pd.Series([1,2,3,4,5],index=['a','b','c','d','e'])
series2 = pd.Series([1,2,3,4,5],index=['f','g','h','i','j'])
series3 = pd.Series([1,2,3,4,5],index=['k','l','m','n','o'])
Combine1 = series1.combine_first(series2)
print(Combine1
Output:
a 1.0
b 2.0
c 3.0
d 4.0
e 5.0
f 1.0
g 2.0
h 3.0
i 4.0
j 5.0
dtype: float64
What if I need to merge 3 or more series?
I understand that using the following code: print(series1 + series2 + series3)
yields:
a NaN
b NaN
c NaN
d NaN
e NaN
f NaN
...
dtype: float64
Can I merge multiple series efficiently without using combine_first
multiple times?
Thanks
To combine series vertically, use pd.concat
.
# Setup
series_list = [
pd.Series(range(1, 6), index=list('abcde')),
pd.Series(range(1, 6), index=list('fghij')),
pd.Series(range(1, 6), index=list('klmno'))
]
pd.concat(series_list)
a 1
b 2
c 3
d 4
e 5
f 1
g 2
h 3
i 4
j 5
k 1
l 2
m 3
n 4
o 5
dtype: int64
series_list = [
pd.Series(range(1, 6), index=list('abcde')),
pd.Series(range(1, 6), index=list('abcde')),
pd.Series(range(1, 6), index=list('kbmdf'))
]
If the Series have overlapping indices, you can either combine (add) the keys,
pd.concat(series_list, axis=1, sort=False).sum(axis=1)
a 2.0
b 6.0
c 6.0
d 12.0
e 10.0
k 1.0
m 3.0
f 5.0
dtype: float64
Alternatively, just drop duplicates values on the index if you want to take only the first/last value (when there are duplicates).
res = pd.concat(series_list, axis=0)
# keep first value
res[~res.index.duplicated(keep='first')]
# keep last value
res[~res.index.duplicated(keep='last')]
Presuming that you were using the behavior of combine_first
to prioritize the values of the series in order as combine_first
is meant for, you could succinctly make multiple calls to it with a lambda expression.
from functools import reduce
l_series = [series1, series2, series3]
reduce(lambda s1, s2: s1.combine_first(s2), l_series)
Of course if the indices are unique as in your current example, you can simply use pd.concat
instead.
Demo
series1 = pd.Series(list(range(5)),index=['a','b','c','d','e'])
series2 = pd.Series(list(range(5, 10)),index=['a','g','h','i','j'])
series3 = pd.Series(list(range(10, 15)),index=['k','b','m','c','o'])
from functools import reduce
l_series = [series1, series2, series3]
print(reduce(lambda s1, s2: s1.combine_first(s2), l_series))
# a 0.0
# b 1.0
# c 2.0
# d 3.0
# e 4.0
# g 6.0
# h 7.0
# i 8.0
# j 9.0
# k 10.0
# m 12.0
# o 14.0
# dtype: float64
Agree with what @codespeed has pointed out in his answer.
I think it will depend on user needs. If series index are confirmed with no overlapping, concat will be a better option. (as original question posted, there is no index overlapping, then concat will be a better option)
If there is index overlapping, you might need to consider how to handle overlapping, which value to be overwritten. (as example provided by codespeed, if index are matching to different values, need to be careful about combine_first)
i.e. (note series3 is same as series1, series2 is same as series4)
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
series1 = pd.Series([1,2,3,4,5],index=['a','b','c','d','e'])
series2 = pd.Series([2,3,4,4,5],index=['a','b','c','i','j'])
series3 = pd.Series([1,2,3,4,5],index=['a','b','c','d','e'])
series4 = pd.Series([2,3,4,4,5],index=['a','b','c','i','j'])
print(series1.combine_first(series2))
a 1.0
b 2.0
c 3.0
d 4.0
e 5.0
i 4.0
j 5.0
dtype: float64
print(series4.combine_first(series3))
a 2.0
b 3.0
c 4.0
d 4.0
e 5.0
i 4.0
j 5.0
dtype: float64
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With