Say I have a dataframe with 3 columns: Date, Ticker, Value (no index, at least to start with). I have many dates and many tickers, but each (ticker, date)
tuple is unique. (But obviously the same date will show up in many rows since it will be there for multiple tickers, and the same ticker will show up in multiple rows since it will be there for many dates.)
Initially, my rows in a specific order, but not sorted by any of the columns.
I would like to compute first differences (daily changes) of each ticker (ordered by date) and put these in a new column in my dataframe. Given this context, I cannot simply do
df['diffs'] = df['value'].diff()
because adjacent rows do not come from the same ticker. Sorting like this:
df = df.sort(['ticker', 'date']) df['diffs'] = df['value'].diff()
doesn't solve the problem because there will be "borders". I.e. after that sort, the last value for one ticker will be above the first value for the next ticker. And computing differences then would take a difference between two tickers. I don't want this. I want the earliest date for each ticker to wind up with an NaN
in its diff column.
This seems like an obvious time to use groupby
but for whatever reason, I can't seem to get it to work properly. To be clear, I would like to perform the following process:
ticker
date
value
columndiffs
column (ideally leaving the original dataframe order in tact.)I have to imagine this is a one-liner. But what am I missing?
Edit at 9:00pm 2013-12-17
Ok...some progress. I can do the following to get a new dataframe:
result = df.set_index(['ticker', 'date'])\ .groupby(level='ticker')\ .transform(lambda x: x.sort_index().diff())\ .reset_index()
But if I understand the mechanics of groupby, my rows will now be sorted first by ticker
and then by date
. Is that correct? If so, would I need to do a merge to append the differences column (currently in result['current']
to the original dataframe df
?
diff() function. This function calculates the difference between two consecutive DataFrame elements. Parameters: periods: Represents periods to shift for computing difference, Integer type value.
Pandas offers a number of functions related to adjusting rows and enabling you to calculate the difference between them. For example, the Pandas shift method allows us to shift a dataframe in different directions, for example up and down. Because of this, we can easily use the shift method to subtract between rows.
You can use the DataFrame. diff() function to find the difference between two rows in a pandas DataFrame. where: periods: The number of previous rows for calculating the difference.
wouldn't be just easier to do what yourself describe, namely
df.sort(['ticker', 'date'], inplace=True) df['diffs'] = df['value'].diff()
and then correct for borders:
mask = df.ticker != df.ticker.shift(1) df['diffs'][mask] = np.nan
to maintain the original index you may do idx = df.index
in the beginning, and then at the end you can do df.reindex(idx)
, or if it is a huge dataframe, perform the operations on
df.filter(['ticker', 'date', 'value'])
and then join
the two dataframes at the end.
edit: alternatively, ( though still not using groupby
)
df.set_index(['ticker','date'], inplace=True) df.sort_index(inplace=True) df['diffs'] = np.nan for idx in df.index.levels[0]: df.diffs[idx] = df.value[idx].diff()
for
date ticker value 0 63 C 1.65 1 88 C -1.93 2 22 C -1.29 3 76 A -0.79 4 72 B -1.24 5 34 A -0.23 6 92 B 2.43 7 22 A 0.55 8 32 A -2.50 9 59 B -1.01
this will produce:
value diffs ticker date A 22 0.55 NaN 32 -2.50 -3.05 34 -0.23 2.27 76 -0.79 -0.56 B 59 -1.01 NaN 72 -1.24 -0.23 92 2.43 3.67 C 22 -1.29 NaN 63 1.65 2.94 88 -1.93 -3.58
Ok. Lots of thinking about this, and I think this is my favorite combination of the solutions above and a bit of playing around. Original data lives in df
:
df.sort(['ticker', 'date'], inplace=True) # for this example, with diff, I think this syntax is a bit clunky # but for more general examples, this should be good. But can we do better? df['diffs'] = df.groupby(['ticker'])['value'].transform(lambda x: x.diff()) df.sort_index(inplace=True)
This will accomplish everything I want. And what I really like is that it can be generalized to cases where you want to apply a function more intricate than diff
. In particular, you could do things like lambda x: pd.rolling_mean(x, 20, 20)
to make a column of rolling means where you don't need to worry about each ticker's data being corrupted by that of any other ticker (groupby
takes care of that for you...).
So here's the question I'm left with...why doesn't the following work for the line that starts df['diffs']
:
df['diffs'] = df.groupby[('ticker')]['value'].transform(np.diff)
when I do that, I get a diffs
column full of 0's. Any thoughts on that?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With