Let's consider I have the following class:
class A {
int i, j, k;
public A(int i, int j, int k) {
this.i = i; this.j = j; this.k = k;
}
}
where i
, j
, k
have a known range: r_i
, r_j
, r_k
. Now I want to to generate
all possible instances of A
in this range. I could come up with something like:
Stream.iterate(0, n -> ++n).limit(r_i)
.flatMap(i -> Stream.iterate(0, n -> ++n).limit(r_j)
.flatMap(j -> Stream.iterate(0, n -> ++n).limit(r_k)
.map(k -> new A(i, j, k)))).collect(Collectors.toList())
First, it's too verbose. Is there a way to shorten it? In particular I couldn't find a range
on Stream
. Second, the compiler cannot determine the type of the returned type. It considers it as
List<Object>
instead of the expected List<A>
. How can I fix that?
One way of using range
is to perform a boxing conversion right afterwards:
List<A> list=IntStream.range(0, r_i).boxed()
.flatMap(i -> IntStream.range(0, r_j).boxed()
.flatMap(j -> IntStream.range(0, r_k)
.mapToObj(k -> new A(i, j, k)))).collect(Collectors.toList());
It’s not the most beautiful code but IntStream.range(0, max).boxed()
is still better than Stream.iterate(0, n -> n+1).limit(max)
…
One alternative is to use a real flattening operation rather than nested operations:
List<A> list=IntStream.range(0, r_i).boxed()
.flatMap(i -> IntStream.range(0, r_j).mapToObj(j -> new int[]{i,j}))
.flatMap(ij -> IntStream.range(0, r_k).mapToObj(k -> new A(ij[0], ij[1], k)))
.collect(Collectors.toList());
The main drawback I see is that it suffers from the absence of an IntPair
or Tuple<int,int>
type. So it uses an array as a work-around.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With