Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Complex circular dependency

what is the the best practice of solving circular dependency in C++?

I could use the forward declaration, but then I get the pointer to incomplete class type is not allowed error. Does that mean that two classes that uses each others pointer cannot be dependent?

Also, I thought about forward declaring each class and then including every header of the solution in the main.cpp, so it's all in one place. Would you recommend it?

A snippet from the whole project is below, so you can refer to it if the issue is better explained on an example I'm familiar with, but it would do just to be theoretical. Thanks

Models depending on each other

like image 216
Mikulas Dite Avatar asked Mar 19 '11 17:03

Mikulas Dite


2 Answers

You just need to use forward declaration correctly:

  1. Put all code in cpp files
  2. Put just class declaration in header file
  3. In header file:
    1. Use forward declaration if you only use a pointer or a reference.
    2. Otherwise you to include header file. (Do Not add unrequired includes)
  4. In cpp file
    1. include all header files you require.

Note: Add include guards.

Its hard to actually do it without the actual declarations. The diagram is nice but does not have enough information. A picture may be worth a thousand words, but a precisely defined language can convey more exact information very compactly (unlike English and its inconsistencies).

like image 65
Martin York Avatar answered Oct 12 '22 01:10

Martin York


One thought is to introduce interfaces and remove the circular dependencies. So you would have an IEffect that Effect, Player, and EffectContainer depend on. Possibly, if Player depends on certain behavior of Effect and EffectContainer depends on a different set of behavior, I would consider introducing two interfaces, effectively following the Interface Segregation Principle. This would also follow along with the Dependency Inversion Principle.

like image 28
David Paxson Avatar answered Oct 12 '22 02:10

David Paxson