I am new to Ocaml and trying to write some small example application. I am using ocamlc
version 3.11.2 under Linux Ubuntu 10.04. I want to compile two files:
a.ml
b.ml
File b.ml
uses definitions from a.ml
. As far as I understand, I can use ocamlc -c
to perform compilation only. I can call ocamlc
one final time when I have all the .cmo
files to link them to an executable. Also, when compiling a file that uses definitions from another file, I have to tell the compiler in which .cmi
file to find the external definitions.
So my idea was to use:
ocamlc -i -c a.ml > a.mli
ocamlc -c a.mli b.ml
ocamlc -o b a.cmo b.cmo
The first step works and produces files a.mli
and a.cmo
, but when running the second step I get
File "b.ml", line 1, characters 28-31:
Error: Unbound value foo
where foo
is a function that is defined in a.ml
and called in b.ml
.
So my question is: how can I compile each source file separately and specify the interfaces to be imported on the command line? I have been looking in the documentation and as far as I can understand I have to specify the .mli
files to be included, but I do not know how.
EDIT
Here some more details. File a.ml
contains the definition
let foo = 5;;
File b.ml
contains the expression
print_string (string_of_int foo) ^ "\n";;
The real example is bigger but with these files I already have the error I reported above.
EDIT 2
I have edited file b.ml
and replaced foo
with A.foo
and this works (foo is visible in b.ml
even though I have another compilation error which is not important for this question). I guess it is cleaner to write my own .mli
files explicitly, as suggested by
OCaml comes with two compilers: ocamlc is the bytecode compiler, and ocamlopt is the native code compiler. If you don't know which one to use, use ocamlopt since it provides executables that are faster than bytecode. The compiler produces an executable named program or program.exe .
This chapter describes the OCaml high-performance native-code compiler ocamlopt, which compiles OCaml source files to native code object files and links these object files to produce standalone executables. The native-code compiler is only available on certain platforms.
It would be clearer if you showed the code that's not working. As Kristopher points out, though, the most likely problem is that you're not specifyig which module foo
is in. You can specify the module explicitly, as A.foo
. Or you can open A
and just use the name foo
.
For a small example it doesn't matter, but for a big project you should be careful not to use open
too freely. You want the freedom to use good names in your modules, and if you open too many of them, the good names can conflict with each other.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With