Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

comparison of truncate vs delete in mysql/sqlserver [duplicate]

People also ask

Which one is better truncate or delete in SQL Server?

Truncate removes all records and doesn't fire triggers. Truncate is faster compared to delete as it makes less use of the transaction log. Truncate is not possible when a table is referenced by a Foreign Key or tables are used in replication or with indexed views.

Which is faster truncate or delete in SQL?

TRUNCATE is faster than DELETE , as it doesn't scan every record before removing it. TRUNCATE TABLE locks the whole table to remove data from a table; thus, this command also uses less transaction space than DELETE . Unlike DELETE , TRUNCATE does not return the number of rows deleted from the table.

What are 2 differences between delete and truncate?

Delete and truncate both commands can be used to delete data of the table. Delete is a DML command whereas truncate is DDL command. Truncate can be used to delete the entire data of the table without maintaining the integrity of the table. On the other hand , delete statement can be used for deleting the specific data.

What is the difference between truncate and delete table in SQL Server?

The DELETE statement removes rows one at a time and records an entry in the transaction log for each deleted row. TRUNCATE TABLE removes the data by deallocating the data pages used to store the table data and records only the page deallocations in the transaction log.


DELETE

  1. DELETE is a DML Command.
  2. DELETE statement is executed using a row lock, each row in the table is locked for deletion.
  3. We can specify filters in where clause
  4. It deletes specified data if where condition exists.
  5. Delete activates a trigger because the operation are logged individually.
  6. Slower than truncate because, it keeps logs.
  7. Rollback is possible.

TRUNCATE

  1. TRUNCATE is a DDL command.
  2. TRUNCATE TABLE always locks the table and page but not each row.
  3. Cannot use Where Condition.
  4. It Removes all the data.
  5. TRUNCATE TABLE cannot activate a trigger because the operation does not log individual row deletions.
  6. Faster in performance wise, because it doesn't keep any logs.
  7. Rollback is possible.


  • DELETE and TRUNCATE both can be rolled back when used with TRANSACTION (TRUNCATE can be rolled back in SQL Server, but not in MySQL).
  • if there is a PK with auto increment, truncate will reset the counter

http://beginner-sql-tutorial.com/sql-delete-statement.htm


Difference

The most important difference is DELETE operations are transaction-safe and logged, which means DELETE can be rolled back. TRUNCATE cannot be done inside a transaction and can’t be rolled back. Because TRUNCATE is not logged recovering a mistakenly TRUNCATEd table is a much bigger problem than recovering from a DELETE.

DELETE will fail if foreign key constraints are broken; TRUNCATE may not honor foreign key constraints (it does for InnoDB tables). DELETE will fire any ON DELETE triggers; TRUNCATE will not.

FASTER

Truncate operations drop and re-create the table, which is much faster than deleting rows one by one, particularly for large tables.

Where to USE

truncate

when table set to empty, and need reset auto-incrementing keys to 1. It's faster than DELETE because it deletes all data. DELETE will scan the table to generate a count of rows that were affected.

delete

need rows to delete based on an optional WHERE clause. need logs and apply foreign key constraints


The DELETE command is used to remove rows from a table

TRUNCATE removes all rows from a table. The operation cannot be rolled back and no triggers will be fired. As such, TRUNCATE is faster and doesn't use as much undo space as a DELETE.


Difference:

  1. Truncate deletes the complete data from the table and next auto increment id will start with 1 whereas Delete will start with next id.
  2. Both will keep structure intact and delete data only.
  3. with Delete you can use limit whereas with Truncate you can't.