Arrays 'A' and vector 'B' below are part of pandas dataframe.
I have a large array A
of form:
28 39 52
77 80 66
7 18 24
9 97 68
I have a vector B
of form:
32
5
42
17
How do I compare pythonically each column of A against B. I am trying to get True/False values for A < B comparison to get the following result:
TRUE FALSE FALSE
FALSE FALSE FALSE
TRUE TRUE TRUE
TRUE FALSE FALSE
I can do list comprehension syntax but is there a better way to pull this off. My array A and B are very large.
A column vector is a matrix with 1 column. Let's take a look at a formal definition of a column vector. A column vector is a m × 1 matrix consisting of a single column with m elements.
If a matrix has only one column, then it is a column vector. If a matrix has only one row, then it is a row vector. A 1x1 matrix is a scalar.
2.1. One way to create a column vector is to explicitly put the values in square brackets, separated by semicolons (rather than commas or spaces): >> c = [1; 2; 3; 4] c = 1.
Consider the pd.DataFrame
and pd.Series
, A
and B
A = pd.DataFrame([
[28, 39, 52],
[77, 80, 66],
[7, 18, 24],
[9, 97, 68]
])
B = pd.Series([32, 5, 42, 17])
pandas
By default, when you compare a pd.DataFrame
with a pd.Series
, pandas aligns each index value from the series with the column names of the dataframe. This is what happens when you use A < B
. In this case, you have 4 rows in your dataframe and 4 elements in your series, so I'm going to assume you want to align the index values of the series with the index values of the dataframe. In order to specify the axis you want to align with, you need to use the comparison method rather than the operator. That's because when you use the method, you can use the axis
parameter and specify that you want axis=0
rather than the default axis=1
.
A.lt(B, axis=0)
0 1 2
0 True False False
1 False False False
2 True True True
3 True False False
I often just write this as A.lt(B, 0)
numpy
In numpy, you also have to pay attention to the dimensionality of the arrays and you are assuming that the positions are already lined up. The positions will be taken care of if they come from the same dataframe.
print(A.values)
[[28 39 52]
[77 80 66]
[ 7 18 24]
[ 9 97 68]]
print(B.values)
[32 5 42 17]
Notice that B
is a 1 dimensional array while A is a 2 dimensional array. In order to compare B
along the rows of A
we need to reshape B
into a 2 dimensional array. The most obvious way to do this is with reshape
print(A.values < B.values.reshape(4, 1))
[[ True False False]
[False False False]
[ True True True]
[ True False False]]
However, these are ways in which you will commonly see others do the same reshaping
A.values < B.values.reshape(-1, 1)
Or
A.values < B.values[:, None]
To get a handle of how fast these comparisons are, I've constructed the following back test.
def pd_cmp(df, s):
return df.lt(s, 0)
def np_cmp_a2a(df, s):
"""To get an apples to apples comparison
I return the same thing in both functions"""
return pd.DataFrame(
df.values < s.values[:, None],
df.index, df.columns
)
def np_cmp_a2o(df, s):
"""To get an apples to oranges comparison
I return a numpy array"""
return df.values < s.values[:, None]
results = pd.DataFrame(
index=pd.Index([10, 1000, 100000], name='group size'),
columns=pd.Index(['pd_cmp', 'np_cmp_a2a', 'np_cmp_a2o'], name='method'),
)
from timeit import timeit
for i in results.index:
df = pd.concat([A] * i, ignore_index=True)
s = pd.concat([B] * i, ignore_index=True)
for j in results.columns:
results.set_value(
i, j,
timeit(
'{}(df, s)'.format(j),
'from __main__ import {}, df, s'.format(j),
number=100
)
)
results.plot()
I can conclude that the numpy
based solutions are faster but not all that much. They all scale the same.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With