Menu
It looks like it's quite possible to get a useful coverage report for Haml code, due to its one one-statement-per-line structure.
Do you know of any code coverage tools for Haml? Maybe something is in the works?
371
Cobertura. Cobertura is an open-source tool for measuring code coverage. It does so by instrumenting the byte code.
#1) Parasoft JTest Its report provides a good picture of code covered and thereby minimizes risks. Key Features: It is used for Java-based applications. It is a multi-tasking tool which includes Data flow analysis, Unit testing, Static analysis, runtime error detection, code coverage testing etc.
To calculate the code coverage percentage, simply use the following formula: Code Coverage Percentage = (Number of lines of code executed by a testing algorithm/Total number of lines of code in a system component) * 100.
With RubyMine, you can measure how much of your code is covered with tests using the SimpleCov analysis tool. You can run tests with coverage for any supported testing framework, analyze the percentage of covered files and lines in a separate tool window and editor, generate HTML reports, and so on.
Code coverage generally makes sure you cover all your code-paths. If you have a lot of logic in your view, that is a smell. I think logic should be moved to your helpers, controllers (render a different view) or presenters, and those you can test with perfect coverage.
Aside of that: theoretically it should be possible, but i would not want to encourage placing too much "intelligence" in views.
85
One problem with non-mainstream languages (such as HAML) is that tools are hard to find, because they are hard to build.
This technical paper Branch Coverage for Arbitrary Languages Made Easy (I'm the author) describes how to build test coverage tools for langauges in systematic way to help get around this problem, using a generic tool-building infrastructure.
29
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
