I have to find the maximum and minimum value of very huge arrays. For this I'm using
Math.max.apply(Math, my_array);
Math.min.apply(Math, my_array);
It works good on Firefox and IE, but on Chrome I always get Maximum call stack size exceeded
errors... my current array has 221954 elements, and that's not my biggest.
Does someone know how to solve this error on Chrome? How can I optimize the search of max and min value?
For those people who can't believe, try this in the console of Chrome:
var xxx = []
for(var i=0; i<300000; i++){
xxx.push(Math.random());
}
Math.max.apply(Math, xxx);
---> RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded
The call stack is limited in size, and when it's exceeded, the RangeError is thrown. This can happen when a deeply nested function is called, or when a lot of new variables are created. The most common way to fix this error is to reduce the number of function calls, or to limit the number of variables that are created.
The JavaScript RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded is an error that occurs when there are too many function calls, or if a function is missing a base case.
It means that somewhere in your code, you are calling a function which in turn calls another function and so forth, until you hit the call stack limit. This is almost always because of a recursive function with a base case that isn't being met.
This problem has nothing to do specifically with Math.max and Math.min.
Function.prototype.apply can only receive array of limited length as its second argument.
Locally, I tested it in Chrome using:
function limit(l) {
var x = []; x.length = l;
(function (){}).apply(null, x);
}
Locally, limit(l) crashed exactly with l = 124980. In canary, that was another number, but also ~125k.
This is an example explanation of why that happens: https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=2896 (it is also reprodusible in other JS engines, for example MDN has a mention of the issue: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Function/apply#Using_apply_and_built-in_functions (Starting with "But beware..."), pointing to this issue in WebKit bugzilla: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80797). As far as I understand why RangeError is thrown in V8:
V8 implements Function.prototype.apply in assembly. Before calling the function, it should place all function call parameters, e.g. thisArg, and all of the members of 2nd arg array, one by one, onto stack, before calling the javascript function. But the stack has limited capacity, and if you hit the limit, you will get RangeError.
This is what I've found in V8 source (IA-32 assembly, builtins-ia32.cc):
void Builtins::Generate_FunctionApply(MacroAssembler* masm) {
static const int kArgumentsOffset = 2 * kPointerSize;
static const int kReceiverOffset = 3 * kPointerSize;
static const int kFunctionOffset = 4 * kPointerSize;
{
FrameScope frame_scope(masm, StackFrame::INTERNAL);
__ push(Operand(ebp, kFunctionOffset)); // push this
__ push(Operand(ebp, kArgumentsOffset)); // push arguments
__ InvokeBuiltin(Builtins::APPLY_PREPARE, CALL_FUNCTION);
// Check the stack for overflow. We are not trying to catch
// interruptions (e.g. debug break and preemption) here, so the "real stack
// limit" is checked.
Label okay;
ExternalReference real_stack_limit =
ExternalReference::address_of_real_stack_limit(masm->isolate());
__ mov(edi, Operand::StaticVariable(real_stack_limit));
// Make ecx the space we have left. The stack might already be overflowed
// here which will cause ecx to become negative.
// !! ADDED COMMENT: IA-32 stack grows downwards, if address to its current top is 0 then it cannot be placed any more elements into. esp is the pointer to stack top.
__ mov(ecx, esp);
// !! ADDED COMMENT: edi holds the "real_stack_limit", which holds the minimum address that stack should not grow beyond. If we subtract edi from ecx (=esp, or, in other words, "how much space is left on the stack"), we may get a negative value, and the comment above says that
__ sub(ecx, edi);
// Make edx the space we need for the array when it is unrolled onto the
// stack.
// !! ADDED COMMENT: eax holds the number of arguments for this apply call, where every member of the 2nd argument array counts as separate argument
__ mov(edx, eax);
// !! ADDED COMMENT: kPointerSizeLog2 - kSmiTagSize is the base-2-logarithm of how much space would 1 argument take. By shl we in fact get 2^(kPointerSizeLog2 - kSmiTagSize) * arguments_count, i.e. how much space do actual arguments occupy
__ shl(edx, kPointerSizeLog2 - kSmiTagSize);
// Check if the arguments will overflow the stack.
// !! ADDED COMMENT: we compare ecx which is how much data we can put onto stack with edx which now means how much data we need to put onto stack
__ cmp(ecx, edx);
__ j(greater, &okay); // Signed comparison.
// Out of stack space.
__ push(Operand(ebp, 4 * kPointerSize)); // push this
__ push(eax);
__ InvokeBuiltin(Builtins::APPLY_OVERFLOW, CALL_FUNCTION);
Please check !! ADDED COMMENT for explanations of how I understand it.
And this is APPLY_OVERFLOW function, written in JS (again, V8 source, runtime.js):
function APPLY_OVERFLOW(length) {
throw %MakeRangeError('stack_overflow', []);
}
EDIT: In your case, I would go like:
var max = -Infinity;
for(var i = 0; i < arr.length; i++ ) if (arr[i] > max) max = arr[i];
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With