I've found this piece of code on Koders:
private ServiceProvider SiteServiceProvider
{
get
{
if (serviceProvider == null)
{
serviceProvider = new ServiceProvider(site as VSOLE.IServiceProvider);
Debug.Assert(serviceProvider != null, "Unable to get ServiceProvider from site object.");
}
return serviceProvider;
}
}
I'm wondering, is there any possible way the Debug.Assert(serviceProvider != null
could trigger? I'm under the impression that new
could only be aborted by an exception, in which case the assert would never be reached.
Learn how to check a character value in C We have access to several useful checks: isalnum() checks if a character is alphanumeric. isalpha() checks if a character is alphabetic. iscntrl() checks if a character is a control character. isdigit() checks if a character is a digit.
For most people, C++ is the better choice. It has more features, more applications, and for most people, learning C++ is easier. C is still relevant, and learning to program in C can improve how you program in C++. Neither language is a bad choice, and both have realistic career applications.
What is the C programming language standard? It is the standard way defined for the compiler creators about the compilation of the code. The latest C standard was released in June 2018 which is ISO/IEC 9899:2018 also known as the C11.
And I would say it's not the easiest language, because C is a rather low level programming language. Today, C is widely used in embedded devices, and it powers most of the Internet servers, which are built using Linux. The Linux kernel is built using C, and this also means that C powers the core of all Android devices.
It's possible that the ServiceProvider overrides the !=/== operator, so that for an invalid state the comparison to null returns true.
Looks strange anyway.
I would expect that "test for null" pattern more if it was a factory method - i.e.
SomeType provider = SomeFactory.CreateProvider();
if(provider == null) // damn!! no factory implementation loaded...
{ etc }
There is one other case worth knowing about, but which doesn't apply here (since we know the type we are creating)... Nullable<T>
; this is mainly an issue with generics:
static void Test<T>() where T : new()
{
T x = new T();
if (x == null) Console.WriteLine("wtf?");
}
static void Main()
{
Test<int?>();
}
This is covered more here.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With