With a bit of research I've found that, although ArrayBufferView
wasn't initially exposed (through [NoInterfaceObject]) there appeared to be broad agreement that it should be, due to my described use case.
The initial agreement was to expose the ArrayBufferView
constructor on the DOMWindow
namespace, which was implemented in Safari (and still works in 6.1.1) and Chrome, but was then pulled from Chrome in favour of a static method ArrayBuffer.isView()
.
Meanwhile, Mozilla are (still) talking about implementing ArrayBuffer.isView()
.
Safari exposes the ArrayBufferView
constructor
Chrome has ArrayBuffer.isView()
Firefox has nothing
IE - I haven't even got near yet...
So, my question. What's the most succinct way to check if an object is an instance of ArrayBufferView?
I would use either:
function isAbv(value) {
return value && value.buffer instanceof ArrayBuffer && value.byteLength !== undefined;
}
or:
var ArrayBufferView = Object.getPrototypeOf(Object.getPrototypeOf(new Uint8Array)).constructor;
function isAbv(value) {
return value instanceof ArrayBufferView;
}
Better answer I guess:
var arr = new Float64Array(100);
arr instanceof (new Uint16Array()).constructor.prototype.__proto__.constructor //true
works in Chrome & Firefox, maybe other browsers too
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With