Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Celery Worker Database Connection Pooling

I am using Celery standalone (not within Django). I am planning to have one worker task type running on multiple physical machines. The task does the following

  1. Accept an XML document.
  2. Transform it.
  3. Make multiple database reads and writes.

I'm using PostgreSQL, but this would apply equally to other store types that use connections. In the past, I've used a database connection pool to avoid creating a new database connection on every request or avoid keeping the connection open too long. However, since each Celery worker runs in a separate process, I'm not sure how they would actually be able to share the pool. Am I missing something? I know that Celery allows you to persist a result returned from a Celery worker, but that is not what I'm trying to do here. Each task can do several different updates or inserts depending on the data processed.

What is the right way to access a database from within a Celery worker?

Is it possible to share a pool across multiple workers/tasks or is there some other way to do this?

like image 542
oneself Avatar asked Jan 25 '13 16:01

oneself


1 Answers

I like tigeronk2's idea of one connection per worker. As he says, Celery maintains its own pool of workers so there really isn't a need for a separate database connection pool. The Celery Signal docs explain how to do custom initialization when a worker is created so I added the following code to my tasks.py and it seems to work exactly like you would expect. I was even able to close the connections when the workers are shutdown:

from celery.signals import worker_process_init, worker_process_shutdown  db_conn = None  @worker_process_init.connect def init_worker(**kwargs):     global db_conn     print('Initializing database connection for worker.')     db_conn = db.connect(DB_CONNECT_STRING)   @worker_process_shutdown.connect def shutdown_worker(**kwargs):     global db_conn     if db_conn:         print('Closing database connectionn for worker.')         db_conn.close() 
like image 136
ThatAintWorking Avatar answered Sep 30 '22 18:09

ThatAintWorking