Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Cast from Void* to TYPE* using C++ style cast: static_cast or reinterpret_cast

So if your converting from Void* to Type* or from Type* to Void* should you use:

void func(void *p)
{
    Params *params = static_cast<Params*>(p);
}

or

void func(void *p)
{
    Params *params = reinterpret_cast<Params*>(p);
}

To me static_cast seems the more correct but I've seen both used for the same purpose. Also, does the direction of the conversion matter. i.e. should I still use static_cast for:

_beginthread(func,0,static_cast<void*>(params)

I have read the other questions on C++ style casting but I'm still not sure what the correct way is for this scenario (I think it is static_cast)

like image 561
Robben_Ford_Fan_boy Avatar asked Jun 17 '10 18:06

Robben_Ford_Fan_boy


2 Answers

You should use static_cast so that the pointer is correctly manipulated to point at the correct location. However, you should only do this if you used static cast to cast the pointer to void* in the first place. Otherwise you should reinterpret_cast to exactly the same type of the original pointer (no bases or such).

like image 78
Edward Strange Avatar answered Sep 20 '22 10:09

Edward Strange


Use static_cast on both sides for this, and save reinterpret_cast for when no other casting operation will do. The following SO topics provide more context and details:

What wording in the C++ standard allows static_cast<non-void-type*>(malloc(N)); to work?

When to use reinterpret_cast?

like image 33
Owen S. Avatar answered Sep 19 '22 10:09

Owen S.