I am using these two derivates of GBM on Caret. I tried both algo on the same dataset and they return different accuracy and perform in different time. By the name, I can think that the first use a Linear function somewhere, and the other use trees. Anyway, I do not understand where it uses the Linear rather than Tree. I know that GBM algorithms use the tree as the predictor, can be that the first cases use different structure like training? Where can I find some documentation on this topic?
Thanks
You can find more details on the separate models on the caret github page where all the code for the models is located. caret documentation is located here.
But you should be aware of the differences in parameters that are used between the 2 models:
xgbLinear
uses: nrounds, lambda, alpha, etaxgbTree
uses: nrounds, max_depth, eta, gamma, colsample_bytree,
min_child_weightThese choices affect the outcome of the model and will result in different predictions. And therefore also have a different accuracy. Other options that are available in xgboost will be used with the default settings of xgboost.
Caret models contain the dotdotdot (...) option. So if you want to train gamma
with xgbLinear
, you can specify this in the train function. But not in the grid parameter. The same goes for any other xgboost parameter.
(very bad) example:
grid = expand.grid(nrounds = c(10,20), lambda= c(0.1), alpha = c(1), eta = c(0.1))
train(Species ~ ., data = iris, method = "xgbLinear", tuneGrid = grid, gamma = 0.5)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With