I'm looking up an identifier in a C++ source file parsed by Clang. It's a function that takes five arguments which is declared right there in the source file (not a header). When I attempt to call it with one argument, Clang gives an appropriate error- even the full text of the declaration of the function. But when I try to look it up with the API, Clang insists that it does not exist.
Here's the relevant code:
llvm::LLVMContext c;
clang::CompilerInstance CI;
llvm::Module m("", c);
clang::EmitLLVMOnlyAction emit(&c);
emit.setLinkModule(&m);
std::string errors;
llvm::raw_string_ostream error_stream(errors);
clang::DiagnosticOptions diagopts;
clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter printer(error_stream, &diagopts);
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::DiagnosticIDs> diagids(new clang::DiagnosticIDs);
clang::DiagnosticsEngine engine(diagids, &diagopts, &printer, false);
CI.setDiagnostics(&engine);
clang::TargetOptions target;
target.Triple = llvm::sys::getDefaultTargetTriple();
CI.setTarget(clang::TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(engine, &target));
CI.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus0x = true;
CI.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus = true;
clang::FrontendInputFile f("main.cpp", clang::InputKind::IK_CXX, true);
emit.BeginSourceFile(CI, f);
emit.Execute();
auto sema = CI.takeSema();
auto ast = &CI.getASTContext();
CI.resetAndLeakASTContext();
emit.EndSourceFile();
emit.takeModule();
auto identinfo = CI.getPreprocessor().getIdentifierInfo("WriteConsoleW");
auto sloc = CI.getSourceManager().getLocForEndOfFile(CI.getSourceManager().translateFile(CI.getFileManager().getFile("main.cpp")));
clang::LookupResult lr(*sema, clang::DeclarationName(identinfo), sloc, clang::Sema::LookupNameKind::LookupOrdinaryName);
auto result = sema->LookupName(lr, sema->TUScope);
I have verified that identinfo
is not NULL, and that sloc
is also not zero.
Why can't Clang find my name?
Edit: I have succeeded in performing qualified name lookup into the global scope. Unfortunately, this is not quite the same as performing unqualified name lookup- for example, no ADL. Clang still insists that an unqualified function name does not exist.
Edit: The qualified code is similar but refactored to avoid dependencies on the Frontend library, as it has extremely questionable ownership semantics and the action doesn't do what I need anyway.
clang::CompilerInstance ci;
clang::FileSystemOptions fso;
clang::FileManager fm(fso);
std::string errors;
llvm::raw_string_ostream error_stream(errors);
clang::DiagnosticOptions diagopts;
llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::DiagnosticIDs> diagids(new clang::DiagnosticIDs);
clang::DiagnosticsEngine engine(diagids, &diagopts, new clang::TextDiagnosticPrinter(error_stream, &diagopts), false);
clang::SourceManager sm(engine, fm);
clang::LangOptions langopts;
langopts.CPlusPlus = true;
langopts.CPlusPlus0x = true;
clang::TargetOptions target;
target.Triple = llvm::sys::getDefaultTargetTriple();
auto targetinfo = clang::TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(engine, &target);
auto headeropts = llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::HeaderSearchOptions>(new clang::HeaderSearchOptions());
clang::HeaderSearch hs(headeropts, fm, engine, langopts, targetinfo);
auto x = llvm::IntrusiveRefCntPtr<clang::PreprocessorOptions>(new clang::PreprocessorOptions());
clang::Preprocessor p(x, engine, langopts, targetinfo, sm, hs, ci);
clang::ASTContext astcon(langopts, sm, targetinfo, p.getIdentifierTable(), p.getSelectorTable(), p.getBuiltinInfo(), 1000);
clang::CodeGenOptions codegenopts;
clang::CodeGen::CodeGenModule codegen(astcon, codegenopts, m, llvm::DataLayout(&m), engine);
CodeGenConsumer consumer(&codegen);
clang::Sema sema(p, astcon, consumer, clang::TranslationUnitKind::TU_Prefix);
sm.createMainFileID(fm.getFile(filepath));
engine.getClient()->BeginSourceFile(langopts, &p);
clang::ParseAST(sema);
codegen.Release();
engine.getClient()->EndSourceFile();
/*
for (auto it = astcon.getTranslationUnitDecl()->decls_begin(); it != astcon.getTranslationUnitDecl()->decls_end(); ++it) {
if (auto named = llvm::dyn_cast<clang::NamedDecl>(*it)) {
std::cout << named->getNameAsString() << "\n";
}
}*/
clang::LookupResult lr(sema, clang::DeclarationName(p.getIdentifierInfo("f")), sm.getLocForEndOfFile(sm.translateFile(fm.getFile(filepath))), clang::Sema::LookupNameKind::LookupOrdinaryName);
auto result = sema.LookupQualifiedName(lr, astcon.getTranslationUnitDecl());
Apparently, this is just known to be broken right now. I looked through the LookupName implementation and it flat out does not handle this case.
I will have to live with qualified lookup for now.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With