The "s{1}
annoyance" of the title refers to the first line within the for-block below:
for s = some_cell_array s = s{1}; % unpeel the enclosing cell % do stuff with s end
This s = s{1}
business is necessary because the iteration over some_cell_array
does not really iterate over the contents of some_cell_array
, but rather over 1-element cells, each containing an item from some_cell_array
.
Putting aside the question of who could possibly want this behavior as the default, is there any way to iterate over the bare contents of some_cell_array
?
I don't think there is a way to avoid this problem in the general case. But there is a way if your cell array has all numbers or all chars. You can convert to an array and let the for
loop iterate over that.
For example, this:
some_cell_array = {1,2,3} for s = [some_cell_array{:}] % convert to array s end
Gives:
s = 1 s = 2 s = 3
Another option is to create a function that operates on every cell of the array. Then you can simply call cellfun
and not have a loop at all.
I don't have any ideas about who would want this behavior or how it could be useful. My guess as to why it works this way, however, is that it's an implementation thing. This way the loop iterator doesn't change type on different iterations. It is a cell every time, even if the contents of that cell are different types.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With