When inheriting from two objects like these
class Foo(object):
def __init__(self,a):
self.a=a
class Bar(object):
def __init__(self,b):
self.b=b
I would normally do something like this
class FooBar(Foo,Bar):
def __init__(self,a,b):
Foo.__init__(self,a)
Bar.__init__(self,b)
How does super know if I want to call both? and if so how will it know which argument to pass where. Or is it simply not possible to user super here?
Even if Foo and Bar take the same arguments can super
deal with this?
Or should I not be trying to do this kind of this in the first place?
The Java programming language supports multiple inheritance of type, which is the ability of a class to implement more than one interface. An object can have multiple types: the type of its own class and the types of all the interfaces that the class implements.
Supercharge Your Classes With Python super()Python supports inheritance from multiple classes.
Multiple inheritance has been a controversial issue for many years, with opponents pointing to its increased complexity and ambiguity in situations such as the "diamond problem", where it may be ambiguous as to which parent class a particular feature is inherited from if more than one parent class implements said ...
Multiple Inheritance is a feature of an object-oriented concept, where a class can inherit properties of more than one parent class.
Using super()
, __init__()
and multiple inheritance is a bit tricky.
In the normal flow of things, every method calls super()
, with the classes that inherit only from object
doing a little extra work to make sure that the method actually exists: it'll look a bit like this:
>>> class Foo(object):
... def frob(self, arg):
... print "Foo.frob"
... if hasattr(super(Foo, self), 'frob'):
... super(Foo, self).frob(arg)
...
>>> class Bar(object):
... def frob(self, arg):
... print "Bar.frob"
... if hasattr(super(Bar, self), 'frob'):
... super(Bar, self).frob(arg)
...
>>> class Baz(Foo, Bar):
... def frob(self, arg):
... print "Baz.frob"
... super(Baz, self).frob(arg)
...
>>> b = Baz()
>>> b.frob(1)
Baz.frob
Foo.frob
Bar.frob
>>>
But when you try to do something similar on a method that object
actually has, things get a little dicey; object.__init__
doesn't take arguments, so about the only safe way to use it is to call super().__init__()
with no arguments, since that call might be handled by object.__init__
. But then it might not be handled by object.__init__
, and instead handled by a class elsewhere in the inheritance graph. Thus any class which defines __init__
in a multiple inheritance class heirarchy must be prepared to be called with no arguments.
one way of dealing with this is to never use arguments in __init__()
. Do minimal initialization, and rely on setting properties or using other means to configure the new object before use. That's pretty unpleasant, though.
Another way is to use only keyword arguments, something like def __init__(self, **keywords):
and always remove the arguments that apply to the given constructor. This is a hope based strategy, you hope that all of the keywords get consumed before control reaches object.__init__
.
A third way is to define a superclass to all of the multiple-inheritable bases which itself defines __init__
in some useful way and does not call super().__init__
(object.__init__
is a no-op anyway). This means you can be sure that this method is always called last, and you can do whetever you like with your arguments.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With