This is a point about which gcc 4.9.2 and clang 3.5.2 are in sharp disagreement. The program:
template<typename ...Ts> int foo(int i = 0, Ts &&... args) { return i + sizeof...(Ts); } int main() { return foo(); }
compiles without comment from gcc (-std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic
). Clang says:
error: missing default argument on parameter 'args'
With foo
amended to:
template<typename ...Ts> int foo(int i = 0, Ts &&... args = 0) { return i + sizeof...(Ts); }
clang has no complaints, but gcc says:
error: parameter pack ‘args’ cannot have a default argument
Which compiler is right?
D. No parameter of a function can be default.
In JavaScript, a parameter has a default value of undefined. It means that if you don't pass the arguments into the function, its parameters will have the default values of undefined .
Constructors cannot have default parameters.
Default parameter in JavascriptThe default parameter is a way to set default values for function parameters a value is no passed in (ie. it is undefined ). In a function, Ii a parameter is not provided, then its value becomes undefined . In this case, the default value that we specify is applied by the compiler.
From 8.3.6 ([dcl.fct.default])/3:
A default argument shall not be specified for a parameter pack.
From 8.3.6 ([dcl.fct.default])/4:
In a given function declaration, each parameter subsequent to a parameter with a default argument shall have a default argument supplied in this or a previous declaration or shall be a function parameter pack.
So this allows code like void f(int a = 10, Args ... args)
, or indeed like your first snippet. (Thanks to @T.C. for looking up the second sentence!)
A Kerrek SB says, it's not possible. What you could do, instead, is using a std::tuple
template <class ... Args> void foo( std::tuple<Args...> t = std::tuple<int>(0) ) {}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With