The magic incantation
LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libSegFault.so someapp
runs someapp
with libSegFault.so providing backtrace information on a SIGSEGV as described in many different places.
Other than using signal(7)
-like approaches to cause SIGABRT
to invoke the SIGSEGV
handler, is there some way to get libSegFault to provide backtrace information for assert(3)
failures?
env SEGFAULT_SIGNALS="abrt segv" LD_PRELOAD=/lib/libSegFault.so someapp
Note that the actual path to the preload library may differ. On my machine, I'd use
env SEGFAULT_SIGNALS="abrt segv" LD_PRELOAD=/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSegFault.so some-64bit-app
or
env SEGFAULT_SIGNALS="abrt segv" LD_PRELOAD=/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libSegFault.so some-32bit-app
depending whether the application I was running was compiled 64-bit or 32-bit. (You can use file
to check.)
The source tells us there are three environment variables that define how libSegFault.so
behaves:
SEGFAULT_SIGNALS
: The list of signals that cause a stack trace. The default is SIGSEGV
. A defined but empty SEGFAULT_SIGNALS
means no signals cause a stack trace. The supported values are segv
, ill
, abrt
, fpe
, bus
on systems that have the SIGBUS signal, stkflt
on systems that have the SIGSTKFLT signal, and all
for all of these.
SEGFAULT_USE_ALTSTACK
: If defined in the environment, libSegFault.so
uses an altenate stack for the stack trace signals. This may come in handy if you are debugging stack corruption.
SEGFAULT_OUTPUT_NAME
: If defined in the environment, the stack trace is written to this file instead of standard error.
To be honest, I found these initially by examining the library with strings /lib/libSegFault.so | sed -e '/[^0-9A-Z_]/ d'
. All standard libraries (libSegFault.so
having become a part of GNU C library) are tunable via environment variables, so using something like that command to dump any strings that look like environment variable names is a quick way to find stuff to search for. Doing a web search on "SEGFAULT_SIGNALS" "SEGFAULT_OUTPUT_NAME"
produces a number of useful links; seeing that it was part of the GNU C library nowadays, I went to the source git archives, found the actual source file for the library, and posted my answer.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With