React document states that the render
function should be pure which mean it should not use this.setState
in it .However, I believe when the state is depended on 'remote' i.e. result from ajax call.The only solution is setState()
inside a render
function
In my case.Our users can should be able to log in. After login, We also need check the user's access (ajax call )to decide how to display the page.The code is something like this
React.createClass({
render:function(){
if(this.state.user.login)
{
//do not call it twice
if(this.state.callAjax)
{
var self=this
$.ajax{
success:function(result)
{
if(result==a)
{self.setState({callAjax:false,hasAccess:a})}
if(result==b)
{self.setState({callAjax:false,hasAccess:b})}
}
}
}
if(this.state.hasAccess==a) return <Page />
else if(this.state.hasAccess==a) return <AnotherPage />
else return <LoadingPage />
}
else
{
return <div>
<button onClick:{
function(){this.setState({user.login:true})}
}>
LOGIN
</button>
</div>
}
}
})
The ajax call can not appear in componentDidMount
because when user click LOGIN button the page is re-rendered and also need ajax call .So I suppose the only place to setState
is inside the render
function which breach the React principle
Any better solutions ? Thanks in advance
render() Calling setState() here makes it possible for a component to produce infinite loops. The render() function should be pure, meaning that it does not modify a component's state. It returns the same result each time it's invoked, and it does not directly interact with the browser.
What happens when you call setState() inside render() method? Nothing happens.
setState() setState() enqueues changes to the component state and tells React that this component and its children need to be re-rendered with the updated state. This is the primary method you use to update the user interface in response to event handlers and server responses.
In constructor , we should avoid using setState() because this is the only place we directly assign the initial state to this. state . Also, we cannot directly put it in render() either since changing state each time triggers re-rendering which calls setState() again. This will result in an infinite loop.
render
should always remain pure. It's a very bad practice to do side-effecty things in there, and calling setState
is a big red flag; in a simple example like this it can work out okay, but it's the road to highly unmaintainable components, plus it only works because the side effect is async.
Instead, think about the various states your component can be in — like you were modeling a state machine (which, it turns out, you are):
Model this out with your component's state and you're good to go.
React.createClass({
getInitialState: function() {
return {
busy: false, // waiting for the ajax request
hasAccess: null, // what the user has access to
/**
* Our three states are modeled with this data:
*
* Pending: busy === true
* Has Access: hasAccess !== null
* Initial/Default: busy === false, hasAccess === null
*/
};
},
handleButtonClick: function() {
if (this.state.busy) return;
this.setState({ busy: true }); // we're waiting for ajax now
this._checkAuthorization();
},
_checkAuthorization: function() {
$.ajax({
// ...,
success: this._handleAjaxResult
});
},
_handleAjaxResult: function(result) {
if(result === a) {
this.setState({ hasAccess: a })
} else if(result ===b ) {
this.setState({ hasAccess: b })
}
},
render: function() {
// handle each of our possible states
if (this.state.busy) { // the pending state
return <LoadingPage />;
} else if (this.state.hasAccess) { // has access to something
return this._getPage(this.state.hasAccess);
} else {
return <button onClick={this.handleButtonClick}>LOGIN</button>;
}
},
_getPage: function(access) {
switch (access) {
case a:
return <Page />;
case b:
return <AnotherPage />;
default:
return <SomeDefaultPage />;
}
}
});
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With