Here's something that struck me, and I'm wondering if this is at all possible.
To make a long story short - here's the code:
public class NotificationCollection : ObservableCollection<Notification>
{
    public NotificationCollection() : base()
    {
        this.CollectionChanged += NotificationCollection_CollectionChanged;
        this.PropertyChanged += NotificationCollection_PropertyChanged;
    }
    public NotificationCollection(IEnumerable<Notification> items)
        : base(items)
    {
        this.CollectionChanged += NotificationCollection_CollectionChanged;
        this.PropertyChanged += NotificationCollection_PropertyChanged;
    }
(....)
}
As you can see, I'm duplicating code. Had I not been creating an inherited class, I'd write
public NotificationCollection(IEnumerable<Notification> items)
    : this() //I can just call the empty constructor
{
    //do stuff here...
    //however, in case of inheritance this would be handled by base(items)
}
So, my question is - can I call both the base class constructor as well as this constructor?
Short answer: No, you can't.
Workaround:
public NotificationCollection() : this(Enumerable.Empty<Notification>())
{
}
public NotificationCollection(IEnumerable<Notification> items)
    : base(items)
{
    this.CollectionChanged += NotificationCollection_CollectionChanged;
    this.PropertyChanged += NotificationCollection_PropertyChanged;
}
                        If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With