I am trying to figure out how to simplify the following
let's say I have 2 entity classes
public class A
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string City { get; set; }
}
AND
public class B
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Nom { get; set; }
public string Ville { get; set; }
}
classes that are similar, but not the same.
each class has a repository classes it uses for CRUD Operations, for example...
public class RepA
{
public static List<A> GetAll()
{
List<A> list = new List<A>();
A a1 = new A() {Id=1, Name="First A", City="Boston"};
A a2 = new A() {Id=2, Name="First B", City="Chicago"};
A a3 = new A() {Id=3, Name="First C", City="San Francisco"};
list.Add(a1);
list.Add(a2);
list.Add(a3);
return list;
}
public static void SaveAll(List<A> list)
{
foreach (A a in list)
{
Console.WriteLine("Saved Id = {0} Name = {1} City={2}",
a.Id, a.Name, a.City);
}
}
}
AND
public class RepB
{
public static List<B> GetAll()
{
List<B> list = new List<B>();
B b1 = new B() {Id=1, Nom="Second A", Ville="Montreal"};
B b2 = new B() {Id=2, Nom="Second B", Ville="Paris"};
B b3 = new B() {Id=3, Nom="Second C", Ville="New Orleans"};
list.Add(b1);
list.Add(b2);
list.Add(b3);
return list;
}
public static void SaveAll(List<B> list)
{
foreach (B b in list)
{
Console.WriteLine("Saved Id = {0} Name = {1} City={2}", b.Id,
b.Nom, b.Ville);
}
}
}
How would I go about making anonymous call to my repository without having to resort to this, because in my real world example, i have 100 repositories, and not 2.
void Main()
{
ChosenType chosentype = RandomChosenType(); //A or B
switch (chosentype)
{
case ChosenType.A:
var listA = RepA.GetAll();
RepA.SaveAll(listA);
break;
case ChosenType.B:
var listB = RepB.GetAll();
RepB.SaveAll(listB);
break;
default:
break;
}
}
Make a base class
or use an interface
:
public interface IBase<T>
{
List<T> GetAll();
void SaveAll(List<T> items);
}
public class RepA : IBase<RepA>
{
public List<RepA> GetAll() { return new List<RepA>(); }
public void SaveAll(List<RepA> repA) { }
}
public class RepB : IBase<RepB>
{
public List<RepB> GetAll() { return new List<RepB>(); }
public void SaveAll(List<RepB> repB) { }
}
void Main()
{
IBase chosenType = RandomChosenType();
var list = chosenType.GetAll();
}
You should use a single generic repository. The operations should be handled by injected delegates. A repository could look like this:
public class GenericRepositoryExample
{
public void Save<T>(IList<T> persons, SaveDelegate<T> save)
{
foreach (T person in persons)
{
Console.WriteLine(save(person));
}
}
}
Note that the save delegate is passed to the Save method. The SaveDelegate in your example could be declared as:
public delegate string SaveDelegate<T>(T input);
For ease, I have created a HelperClass containing the delegated functions. In real life helper classes should generally be avoided if possible.
public static class HelperClass
{
public static string FrenchSave(B frenchInput)
{
string result = string.Format("ID = {0}; Name = {1}; City = {2}", frenchInput.Id, frenchInput.Nom, frenchInput.ville);
return result;
}
public static string EnglishSave(A englishInput)
{
string result = string.Format("ID = {0}; Name = {1}; City = {2}", englishInput.Id, englishInput.name, englishInput.city);
return result;
}
}
To illustrate the use of this setup, I have created the following unit test:
[Test]
public void TestGenericRepository()
{
IList<A> aList = new List<A>();
aList.Add(new A() { Id = 1, name = "George", city = "Chicago"});
aList.Add(new A() { Id = 2, name = "Bill", city = "Toledo" });
List<B> bList = new List<B>();
bList.Add(new B() {Id= 1, Nom = "Nathalie", ville = "Paris"});
bList.Add(new B() {Id = 2, Nom = "Michelle", ville = "Lyon"});
GenericRepositoryExample repository = new GenericRepositoryExample();
repository.Save<A>(aList,HelperClass.EnglishSave);
repository.Save<B>(bList,HelperClass.FrenchSave);
}
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With