Today's problem is that I need to write an array of numbers in a binary file at a starting position. I have the position where it should start, and I don't want to overwrite values after that, just want to insert the array at the starting position in the file. E.g:
12345
Let's push 456 at position 2:
12456345
I know that probably I'll have to implement it by myself, but I want to know what's your opinion on how to implement that as efficiently as possible.
Yes, it is possible. By opening it with r+ you open it for 'reading and writing' (while w opens it for writing freshly). t -> Opens the file as text, specifically parsing \n as \r\n under Windows. That's better.
Here's a function extend_file_and_insert()
that does the job, more or less.
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <unistd.h>
enum { BUFFERSIZE = 64 * 1024 };
#define MIN(x, y) (((x) < (y)) ? (x) : (y))
/*
off_t is signed
ssize_t is signed
size_t is unsigned
off_t for lseek() offset and return
size_t for read()/write() length
ssize_t for read()/write() return
off_t for st_size
*/
static int extend_file_and_insert(int fd, off_t offset, char const *insert, size_t inslen)
{
char buffer[BUFFERSIZE];
struct stat sb;
int rc = -1;
if (fstat(fd, &sb) == 0)
{
if (sb.st_size > offset)
{
/* Move data after offset up by inslen bytes */
size_t bytes_to_move = sb.st_size - offset;
off_t read_end_offset = sb.st_size;
while (bytes_to_move != 0)
{
ssize_t bytes_this_time = MIN(BUFFERSIZE, bytes_to_move);
ssize_t rd_off = read_end_offset - bytes_this_time;
ssize_t wr_off = rd_off + inslen;
lseek(fd, rd_off, SEEK_SET);
if (read(fd, buffer, bytes_this_time) != bytes_this_time)
return -1;
lseek(fd, wr_off, SEEK_SET);
if (write(fd, buffer, bytes_this_time) != bytes_this_time)
return -1;
bytes_to_move -= bytes_this_time;
read_end_offset -= bytes_this_time; /* Added 2013-07-19 */
}
}
lseek(fd, offset, SEEK_SET);
write(fd, insert, inslen);
rc = 0;
}
return rc;
}
(Note the additional line added 2013-07-19; it was a bug that only shows when the buffer size is smaller than the amount of data to be copied up the file. Thanks to malat for pointing out the error. Code now tested with BUFFERSIZE = 4
.)
This is some small-scale test code:
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <string.h>
static const char base_data[] = "12345";
typedef struct Data
{
off_t posn;
const char *data;
} Data;
static const Data insert[] =
{
{ 2, "456" },
{ 4, "XxxxxxX" },
{ 12, "ZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzX" },
{ 22, "YyyyyyyyyyyyyyyY" },
};
enum { NUM_INSERT = sizeof(insert) / sizeof(insert[0]) };
int main(void)
{
int fd = open("test.dat", O_RDWR | O_TRUNC | O_CREAT, 0644);
if (fd > 0)
{
ssize_t base_len = sizeof(base_data) - 1;
if (write(fd, base_data, base_len) == base_len)
{
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_INSERT; i++)
{
off_t length = strlen(insert[i].data);
if (extend_file_and_insert(fd, insert[i].posn, insert[i].data, length) != 0)
break;
lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_SET);
char buffer[BUFFERSIZE];
ssize_t nbytes;
while ((nbytes = read(fd, buffer, sizeof(buffer))) > 0)
write(1, buffer, nbytes);
write(1, "\n", 1);
}
}
close(fd);
}
return(0);
}
It produces the output:
12456345
1245XxxxxxX6345
1245XxxxxxX6ZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZ345
1245XxxxxxX6ZzzzzzzzzzYyyyyyyyyyyyyyyYzzzzzzzzzzzzzzZ345
It should be tested on some larger files (ones bigger than BUFFERSIZE, but it would be sensible to test with a BUFFERSIZE a lot smaller than 64 KiB; I used 32 bytes and it seemed to be OK). I've only eyeballed the results but the patterns are designed to make it easy to see that they are correct. The code does not check any of the lseek()
calls; that's a minor risk.
First, use ftruncate()
to enlarge the file to the final size. Then copy everything from the old end over to the new end, working your way back to the insertion point. Then overwrite the middle contents with the data you want to insert. This is as efficient as it gets, I think, because filesystems don't generally offer true "insertion" in the middle of files.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With