I need a timer that fires every 25ms. I've been comparing the default Timer
implementation between Windows 10 and Linux (Ubuntu Server 16.10 and 12.04) on both the dotnet core runtime and the latest mono-runtime.
There are some differences in the timer precision that I don't quite understand.
I'm using the following piece of code to test the Timer:
// inside Main()
var s = new Stopwatch();
var offsets = new List<long>();
const int interval = 25;
using (var t = new Timer((obj) =>
{
offsets.Add(s.ElapsedMilliseconds);
s.Restart();
}, null, 0, interval))
{
s.Start();
Thread.Sleep(5000);
}
foreach(var n in offsets)
{
Console.WriteLine(n);
}
Console.WriteLine(offsets.Average(n => Math.Abs(interval - n)));
On windows it's all over the place:
...
36
25
36
26
36
5,8875 # <-- average timing error
Using dotnet core on linux, it's less all over the place:
...
25
30
27
28
27
2.59776536312849 # <-- average timing error
But the mono Timer
is very precise:
...
25
25
24
25
25
25
0.33 # <-- average timing error
Edit: Even on windows, mono still maintains its timing precision:
...
25
25
25
25
25
25
25
24
0.31
What is causing this difference? Is there a benefit to the way the dotnet core runtime does things compared to mono, that justifies the lost precision?
C programming language is a machine-independent programming language that is mainly used to create many types of applications and operating systems such as Windows, and other complicated programs such as the Oracle database, Git, Python interpreter, and games and is considered a programming foundation in the process of ...
Full form of C is “COMPILE”. One thing which was missing in C language was further added to C++ that is 'the concept of CLASSES'. So ++ being the increment operator, C has an incremented version called as “C++”.
C is a general-purpose language that most programmers learn before moving on to more complex languages. From Unix and Windows to Tic Tac Toe and Photoshop, several of the most commonly used applications today have been built on C. It is easy to learn because: A simple syntax with only 32 keywords.
It is fast The programs that you write in C compile and execute much faster than those written in other languages. This is because it does not have garbage collection and other such additional processing overheads. Hence, the language is faster as compared to most other programming languages.
Unfortunately you cannot rely on timers in the .NET framework. The best one has 15 ms frequency even if you want to trigger it in every millisecond. But you can implement a high-resolution timer with microsec precision, too.
Note: This works only when Stopwatch.IsHighResolution
returns true. In Windows this is true starting with Windows XP; however, I did not test other frameworks.
public class HiResTimer
{
// The number of ticks per one millisecond.
private static readonly float tickFrequency = 1000f / Stopwatch.Frequency;
public event EventHandler<HiResTimerElapsedEventArgs> Elapsed;
private volatile float interval;
private volatile bool isRunning;
public HiResTimer() : this(1f)
{
}
public HiResTimer(float interval)
{
if (interval < 0f || Single.IsNaN(interval))
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(interval));
this.interval = interval;
}
// The interval in milliseconds. Fractions are allowed so 0.001 is one microsecond.
public float Interval
{
get { return interval; }
set
{
if (value < 0f || Single.IsNaN(value))
throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(nameof(value));
interval = value;
}
}
public bool Enabled
{
set
{
if (value)
Start();
else
Stop();
}
get { return isRunning; }
}
public void Start()
{
if (isRunning)
return;
isRunning = true;
Thread thread = new Thread(ExecuteTimer);
thread.Priority = ThreadPriority.Highest;
thread.Start();
}
public void Stop()
{
isRunning = false;
}
private void ExecuteTimer()
{
float nextTrigger = 0f;
Stopwatch stopwatch = new Stopwatch();
stopwatch.Start();
while (isRunning)
{
float intervalLocal = interval;
nextTrigger += intervalLocal;
float elapsed;
while (true)
{
elapsed = ElapsedHiRes(stopwatch);
float diff = nextTrigger - elapsed;
if (diff <= 0f)
break;
if (diff < 1f)
Thread.SpinWait(10);
else if (diff < 10f)
Thread.SpinWait(100);
else
{
// By default Sleep(1) lasts about 15.5 ms (if not configured otherwise for the application by WinMM, for example)
// so not allowing sleeping under 16 ms. Not sleeping for more than 50 ms so interval changes/stopping can be detected.
if (diff >= 16f)
Thread.Sleep(diff >= 100f ? 50 : 1);
else
{
Thread.SpinWait(1000);
Thread.Sleep(0);
}
// if we have a larger time to wait, we check if the interval has been changed in the meantime
float newInterval = interval;
if (intervalLocal != newInterval)
{
nextTrigger += newInterval - intervalLocal;
intervalLocal = newInterval;
}
}
if (!isRunning)
return;
}
float delay = elapsed - nextTrigger;
if (delay >= ignoreElapsedThreshold)
{
fallouts += 1;
continue;
}
Elapsed?.Invoke(this, new HiResTimerElapsedEventArgs(delay, fallouts));
fallouts = 0;
// restarting the timer in every hour to prevent precision problems
if (stopwatch.Elapsed.TotalHours >= 1d)
{
stopwatch.Restart();
nextTrigger = 0f;
}
}
stopwatch.Stop();
}
private static float ElapsedHiRes(Stopwatch stopwatch)
{
return stopwatch.ElapsedTicks * tickFrequency;
}
}
public class HiResTimerElapsedEventArgs : EventArgs
{
public float Delay { get; }
internal HiResTimerElapsedEventArgs(float delay)
{
Delay = delay;
}
}
Edit 2021: Using the latest version that does not have the issue @hankd mentions in the comments.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With