//#define NOT_WORKS
#define HOW(X) 0
struct A {
};
struct B {
A a;
};
struct C {
B b;
};
int main(int argc, char **argv) {
A B::*ba = &B::a; // ba is a pointer to B::a member
B C::*cb = &C::b; // cb is a pointer to C::b member
#ifdef NOT_WORKS
{ A C::*ca = &C::b::a; } // error: Symbol a could not be resolved / error: ‘C::b’ is not a class or namespace
{ A C::*ca = cb + ba; } // error: invalid operands of types ‘B C::*’ and ‘A B::*’ to binary ‘operator+’
A C::*ca = HOW(???); // is possible to reach C::b::a by a member pointer?
#endif
C cptr;
A aptr = cptr.*cb.*ba; // is pointer inference chaining the only solution?
return 0;
}
If the inference chaining of member pointers is the only solution to reach a inner member, can i encapsulate this on a single type using templates?
Now the code can be compiled with gcc
Thank you everybody
is possible to reach C::b::a by a member pointer?
Sort of:
C c;
A B::*ca = &B::a; // usage: c.b.*ca;
is pointer inference chaining the only solution?
Yes
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With