Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

C# method group type inference

I'm trying to write a generic method that supplies parameters and calls a function, like this:

class MyClass {
    public int Method(float arg) => 0;
}

TResult Call<T1, TResult>(Func<T1, TResult> func) =>
    func(default(T1));

void Main()
{
    var m = new MyClass();
    var r1 = Call<float, int>(m.Method);
    var r2 = Call(m.Method); // CS0411
}

The last line fails to compile with CS0411. Is there any workaround to get type inference to work here?

Use case: using AutoFixture to generate function call parameters.

like image 445
Asik Avatar asked Mar 15 '16 19:03

Asik


People also ask

What C is used for?

C programming language is a machine-independent programming language that is mainly used to create many types of applications and operating systems such as Windows, and other complicated programs such as the Oracle database, Git, Python interpreter, and games and is considered a programming foundation in the process of ...

What is the full name of C?

In the real sense it has no meaning or full form. It was developed by Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson at AT&T bell Lab. First, they used to call it as B language then later they made some improvement into it and renamed it as C and its superscript as C++ which was invented by Dr. Stroustroupe.

Is C language easy?

C is a general-purpose language that most programmers learn before moving on to more complex languages. From Unix and Windows to Tic Tac Toe and Photoshop, several of the most commonly used applications today have been built on C. It is easy to learn because: A simple syntax with only 32 keywords.

Is C programming hard?

C is more difficult to learn than JavaScript, but it's a valuable skill to have because most programming languages are actually implemented in C. This is because C is a “machine-level” language. So learning it will teach you how a computer works and will actually make learning new languages in the future easier.


1 Answers

Unfortunately no, that's a limitation of type inference in C#. It doesn't really do much with return types, which is what's needed in your case to fully infer the generic arguments to Call<>.

like image 180
Blindy Avatar answered Oct 27 '22 01:10

Blindy