C++ lambda expression for method chains

Question

Let's say I have a Car object which also has an Engine member, and I want to inspect the properties of the object, calling some methods on Car and some methods in Engine. To get te info explicitly I could do

cout << "my car has " << mycar.GetEngine().NCylinders() << " cylinders" << endl;
cout << "my car has " << mycar.NWheels() << " wheels" << endl;

all these calls are of the form mycar.<some method call chain here>. (you can also assume that they all have a compatible return types). How can I have a list of functors, so that I can pass an Car instance and it will execute the calls accordingly.?

I have come up with a solution using <tr1/functional> using nested binds.

#include <iostream>
#include <tr1/functional>
#include <map>

using namespace std;
using namespace std::tr1;
using namespace std::tr1::placeholders;

struct Engine{
    int NCylinders() const {return 12;}
};

struct Car{
    int    NWheels() const {return 4;}
    Engine GetEngine() const {return myEngine;}
private:
    Engine myEngine;
};

int main(){   
    Car mycar;

    map<string,function<double (const Car&)> > carinfos;
    carinfos["cylinders"]   = bind(&Engine::NCylinders,bind(&Car::GetEngine,_1));
    carinfos["wheels"]      = bind(&Car::NWheels,_1);

    map<string,function<double (const Car&)> >::const_iterator info = carinfos.begin();
    for(;info!=carinfos.end();++info){
        cout << "my car has: " << (info->second)(mycar) << " " << info->first << endl;
    }

    return 0;
}

which outputs nicely:

my car has: 12 cylinders
my car has: 4 wheels

But the nested binds can get ugly with longer chains or methods in the middle that have to have fixed arguments and I was wondering if there may be a solution using lambda expressions which could result in something like

 //pseudocode
 carinfos["cylinders"]   = (_1.GetEngine().NCylinder());
 carinfos["wheels"]   = (_1.GetNWheel());

Edit:

@KennyTM and @Kerrek SB have provided excellent answers using the new C++11 lambda expressions. I cannot yet use C++11, so I would appreciate solutions of similar conciseness using C++03

Answer 1

The following, using lambdas rather than binds, doesn't look too awful:

typedef std::map<std::string, std::function<int(Car const &)>> visitor;

int main()
{
  visitor v;
  v["wheels"]    = [](Car const & c) -> int { return c.NWheels(); };
  v["cylinders"] = [](Car const & c) -> int { return c.GetEngine().NCylinders(); };

  Car c;

  for (auto it = v.cbegin(), end = v.cend(); it != end; ++it)
  {
    std::cout << "My car has " << it->second(c) << " " << it->first << ".\n";
  }
}

The loop could be wrapped up in a visit(c, v); function.