I've mostly used C for programming in the last 2 years (previously some Java) and have decided to learn C++, using Qt Creator and the Qt libraries.
My question is whether the following code introduces a memory leak:
// filename is a QStringListIterator
// dir is a QDir
while (filename.hasNext()) {
QString came_from_file(dir.filePath(filename.next()));
QFile file(came_from_file);
file.open(QFile::ReadOnly);
file.readLine();
while (!file.atEnd()) {
QString line(file.readLine());
do_something_with_stuff(line, came_from_file);
}
}
Specifically, I'm not sure what happens to the generated dir.filePath(filename.next())
QString. Is it referenced into came_from_file
or is its pointer lost once it is copied? Is it "copied" (I assume it never is, until changed, due to the Copy-On-Write nature of Qt containers)? Should I write this differently, like QString match = dir.file...
? To my understanding, this should be equal.
It also says in the Qt docs that QFile is going to close() the file if necessary in the destructor. Does the destructor get called? The variable does go "out of scope", but I'm still not sure if this is a case of so-called RAII.
How would I make file
point to a different file?
If I pass variables like this to functions (I assume this is by reference, as the function do_something...
is defined this way), and then they go out of scope, but are insterted into a QHash/QMap/QSet by the function, what happens? Do they get removed and the containers go crazy, or is there some fancy little scheme like ref. counting behind it all? Or are the values simply copied?
I realise similiar questions have been asked before, but I can't seem to figure it out in this example by reading them, as they seem to be different cases.
If there's something wrong with the code or my understanding, please correct me. :)
Thanks, Nanthiel
Specifically, I'm not sure what happens to the generated
dir.filePath(filename.next())
QString.
came_from_file
is a copy (unless RVO kicks in) of the return value of QDir::filePath
, which in turn is a temporary object that is automatically cleaned up. There is no need to assign it to a variable.
Does the destructor get called? The variable does go "out of scope"
When an object goes out of scope, its destructor will be called, unless you use unsafe constructs like longjmp
.
How would I make
file
point to a different file?
I can't find a clean way to do this in the Qt docs for QFile
. I suggest you just declare a new QFile
for the other file. One possibility to do that, and maintain control over the number of open files, is to use scopes:
{
QFile file(some_path);
// do stuff to file
} // end of file's scope, so it will be closed
{
QFile file(other_path);
} // again, end of scope
OTOH, you might want to explicitly close the QFile
so that you can check its state after flush/close.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With