Here's my method:
public void SomeQuery(string email = "", Guid userId = Guid.Empty)
{
// do some query
}
userId
is giving me an error as it must be a compile-time constant, which i understand. But even when i declare a const:
private const emptyGuid = Guid.Empty;
then change the method signature to:
public void SomeQuery(string email = "", Guid userId = emptyGuid)
{
// do some query
}
still no love.
What am i missing?
C programming language is a machine-independent programming language that is mainly used to create many types of applications and operating systems such as Windows, and other complicated programs such as the Oracle database, Git, Python interpreter, and games and is considered a programming foundation in the process of ...
What is C? C is a general-purpose programming language created by Dennis Ritchie at the Bell Laboratories in 1972. It is a very popular language, despite being old. C is strongly associated with UNIX, as it was developed to write the UNIX operating system.
Compared to other languages—like Java, PHP, or C#—C is a relatively simple language to learn for anyone just starting to learn computer programming because of its limited number of keywords.
In the real sense it has no meaning or full form. It was developed by Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson at AT&T bell Lab. First, they used to call it as B language then later they made some improvement into it and renamed it as C and its superscript as C++ which was invented by Dr.
Have you tried setting it to a new instance of Guid
ala:
public void SomeQuery(string email = "", Guid userId = new Guid())
{
// do some query
}
Should do the trick.
Wouldn't a better solution be to overload the method with a version that doesn't require the Guid? This would solve the issue, and would be a better design in my opinion. Of course, there may be other constraints that I am unaware of necessitating this design.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With