I've written a collection of data structures and functions in C, some of which use the _Bool data type. When I began, the project was going to be pure C. Now I am investigating using a C++ based GUI tool kit and have made the backend code into a library.
However, when compiling the C++ GUI the following error is emitted by the compiler:
ISO C++ forbids declaration of '_Bool' with no type
I initially thought I could search & replace _Bool
to bool
and create:
/* mybool.h */
#ifndef MYBOOL_H
#define MYBOOL_H
typedef _Bool bool;
#endif /* MYBOOL_H */
and then in any headers that use _Bool
#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#else
#include "mybool.h"
#endif
/* rest of header... */
Until I realized this would be compiling the library with one boolean (C _Bool) data type, and linking against the library using another (C++ bool). Practically, this might not matter, but theoretically, it probably does (there might be some obscure system somewhere which doing so like this causes the universe to turn inside out).
I suppose I could just use an int and use 0 for false and 1 for true, and typedef it with something like typedef int mybool
, but it seems unattractive.
Is there a better/idiomatic/standard way to do this?
The C programming language, as of C99, supports Boolean arithmetic with the built-in type _Bool (see _Bool). When the header <stdbool. h> is included, the Boolean type is also accessible as bool .
To use boolean, a header file stdbool. h must be included to use bool in C. bool is an alias to _Bool to avoid breaking existing C code which might be using bool as an identifier.
h was added to allow users the obvious name. That way, if your code didn't have a home-brewed bool , you could use the built in one. So do indeed use stdbool. h if you aren't bound to some existing home-brewed bool .
Using the system header file stdbool. h allows you to use bool as a Boolean data type. true evaluates to 1 and false evaluates to 0 . bool is just a nice spelling for the data type _Bool .
If the C and C++ compilers you are using are from the same vendor then I would expect the C _Bool
to be the same type as C++ bool
, and that including <stdbool.h>
would make everything nicely interoperable. If they are from different vendors then you'll need to check for compatibility.
Note, you can always test the __cplusplus
macro in your header to determine whether or not the code is being compiled as C++, and set the types appropriately.
Formally, there's no solution for this problem. Type _Bool
exists only in C. C++ language does not provide any type that would guarantee binary compatibility with _Bool
. C++ bool
is not guaranteed to be compatible.
The proper solution is not to use bool
or _Bool
in parameter declarations of C functions that are intended to be directly accessible (i.e. linkable) from C++ code. Use int
, char
or any other type that is guaranteed to be compatible.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With