Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

bad use cases of scala.concurrent.blocking?

With reference to the third point in this accepted answer, are there any cases for which it would be pointless or bad to use blocking for a long-running computation, whether CPU- or IO-bound, that is being executed 'within' a Future?

like image 521
Joffer Avatar asked Dec 25 '22 20:12

Joffer


1 Answers

It depends on the ExecutionContext your Future is being executed in.

Pointless:

If the ExecutionContext is not a BlockContext, then using blocking will be pointless. That is, it would use the DefaultBlockContext, which simply executes the code without any special handling. It probably wouldn't add that much overhead, but pointless nonetheless.

Bad:

Scala's ExecutionContext.Implicits.global is made to spawn new threads in a ForkJoinPool when the thread pool is about to be exhausted. That is, if it knows that is going to happen via blocking. This can be bad if you're spawning lots of threads. If you're queuing up a lot of work in a short span of time, the global context will happily expand until gridlock. @dk14's answer explains this in more depth, but the gist is that it can be a performance killer as managed blocking can actually become quickly unmanageable.


The main purpose of blocking is to avoid deadlocks within thread pools, so it is tangentially related to performance in the sense that reaching a deadlock would be worse than spawning a few more threads. However, it is definitely not a magical performance enhancer.

I've written more about blocking in particular in this answer.

like image 192
Michael Zajac Avatar answered Jan 04 '23 20:01

Michael Zajac