My project has a Subversion repository on a network file system, and a new team would like to access it using Git, and be able to commit to it and get updates from it.
What I have in mind is to create a new bare git-svn
clone of the Subversion repository on the same network file system, and make sure the two repositories are always up to date with respect to each other.
The way to do this is probably to add a post-commit hook for both Subversion and the new Git repository, that will each update the other's repository.
The Subversion post-commit hook will include git svn rebase
, and the Git one git svn dcommit
.
The problem is that I will have to use some kind of lock to make sure no one commits to either repository while other is also being committed to, because they always have to be in sync before any commit. This has several disadvantages, among them the time it will take to commit to Subversion or to push to the Git repository (it has to wait for the hook to finish), and the fact that some users may not be able to run git svn
(because it's not installed on their machine), which means they can't update the other repository when committing/pushing.
How can I solve these problems? What will the Subversion and Git hooks look like?
Here is what I've come up with:
Create the git-svn
repository if it doesn't exist already:
git svn init --std-layout <svn_url> <git-svn_path>
The master
branch is created automatically to track the trunk
.
To avoid name ambiguities with Subversion-tracking branches, make the original Subversion branches show as remotes/svn/<branch name>
: go to the newly-created git-svn
repository and run
git config svn-remote.svn.fetch trunk:refs/remotes/svn/trunk
git config svn-remote.svn.branches branches/*:refs/remotes/svn/*
git config svn-remote.svn.tags tags/*:refs/remotes/svn/tags/*
rm .git/refs/remotes/*
git svn fetch
Create a Subversion-tracking branch for each Subversion branch:
for BRANCH in $(svn ls <svn_url>/branches/); do
git branch $BRANCH remotes/svn/$BRANCH
done
Make sure no non-Subversion-tracking branches are created on the central Git repository:
# Used by hooks/update:
git config hooks.denyCreateBranch true
git config hooks.allowDeleteBranch false
cp .git/hooks/update.sample .git/hooks/update
chmod +x .git/hooks/update
Allow pushing to the central Git repository:
git config receive.denyCurrentBranch ignore
git config receive.denyNonFastForwards true
git config push.default current
And create the post-receive hook to reset and send the commits to Subversion:
cat .git/hooks/post-receive
#!/bin/sh
date >> receive.log
git reset --quiet --hard
while read LINE
do
BRANCH=${LINE##*/}
echo Updating $BRANCH
git checkout --quiet --force $BRANCH
git svn dcommit
done 2>&1 | tee -a receive.log
git checkout --quiet --force master
chmod +x .git/hooks/post-receive
The reset is necessary, because otherwise the current branch is out-of-date after each receive.
Finally, create the hook to get updates from Subversion:
cat .git/hooks/svn-rebase-all
#!/bin/sh
date >> .git/svn-rebase.log
git reset --quiet --hard
for REF in .git/refs/heads/*
do
BRANCH=${REF##*/}
echo Updating $BRANCH
git checkout --quiet --force $BRANCH
git svn rebase
done 2>&1 | tee -a .git/svn-rebase.log
git checkout --quiet --force master
chmod +x .git/hooks/svn-rebase-all
And call it from the Subversion post-commit hook:
cat <svn_path>/hooks/post-commit
cd <git_path>
. .git/hooks/svn-rebase-all
chmod +x <svn_path>/hooks/post-commit
Instead of using a single git-svn
central repository, one can use a bare central Git repository and an intermediate non-bare git-svn
repository, as in this answer.
I chose to use one non-bare git-svn
repository which is also the central repository.
Anyone can work on the project using Git by cloning <git_path>
and pushing to it, or using Subversion by checking out <svn_url>
and committing to it.
You're better off with just having each developer learn to use git-svn
directly. There's simply too much of an impedance mismatch between the git and SVN models to be able to robustly implement what you are looking for. The only way you could get it to work even nearly reliably would be to enact the same sort of restrictions that git-svn
would have, but with more moving parts that could break. In my opinion, your revision control system is not the sort of thing that you want to be just partially reliable.
Alternatively just ditch SVN altogether and move all the way to git, if possible.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With