In .NET, one can specify a "mustoverride" attribute to a method in a particular superclass to ensure that subclasses override that particular method. I was wondering whether anybody has a custom java annotation that could achieve the same effect. Essentially what i want is to push for subclasses to override a method in a superclass that itself has some logic that must be run-through. I dont want to use abstract methods or interfaces, because i want some common functionality to be run in the super method, but more-or-less produce a compiler warning/error denoting that derivative classes should override a given method.
@Override @Override annotation informs the compiler that the element is meant to override an element declared in a superclass. Overriding methods will be discussed in Interfaces and Inheritance. While it is not required to use this annotation when overriding a method, it helps to prevent errors.
The @ is Java Annotations. The @Override means that the method is overriding the parent class (in this case createSolver ). The Javadoc states for @Override : Indicates that a method declaration is intended to override a method declaration in a superclass.
It is not necessary, but it is highly recommended. It keeps you from shooting yourself in the foot. It helps prevent the case when you write a function that you think overrides another one but you misspelled something and you get completely unexpected behavior.
Functionally, there is no difference. However, with the annotation, you get the added checks that there is a run() method to override, which can catch bugs where you aren't using the interface you think you are using.
I don't quite see why you would not want to use abstract modifier -- this is intended for forcing implementation by sub-class, and only need to be used for some methods, not all. Or maybe you are thinking of C++ style "pure abstract" classes?
But one other thing that many Java developers are not aware of is that it is also possible to override non-abstract methods and declare them abstract; like:
public abstract String toString(); // force re-definition
so that even though java.lang.Object
already defines an implementation, you can force sub-classes to define it again.
Ignoring abstract methods, there is no such facility in Java. Perhaps its possible to create a compile-time annotation to force that behaviour (and I'm not convinced it is) but that's it.
The real kicker is "override a method in a superclass that itself has some logic that must be run through". If you override a method, the superclass's method won't be called unless you explicitly call it.
In these sort of situations I've tended to do something like:
abstract public class Worker implements Runnable {
@Override
public final void run() {
beforeWork();
doWork();
afterWork();
}
protected void beforeWork() { }
protected void afterWork() { }
abstract protected void doWork();
}
to force a particular logic structure over an interface's method. You could use this, for example, to count invocations without having to worry about whether the user calls super.run()
, etc.
... and if declaring a base class abstract
is not an option you can always throw an UnsupportedOperationException
class BaseClass {
void mustOverride() {
throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Must implement");
}
}
But this is not a compile-time check of course...
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With