Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Asynchronous constructor

How can I best handle a situation like the following?

I have a constructor that takes a while to complete.

var Element = function Element(name){
   this.name = name;
   this.nucleus = {};

   this.load_nucleus(name); // This might take a second.
}

var oxygen = new Element('oxygen');
console.log(oxygen.nucleus); // Returns {}, because load_nucleus hasn't finished.

I see three options, each of which seem out of the ordinary.

One, add a callback to the constructor.

var Element = function Element(name, fn){
   this.name = name;
   this.nucleus = {};

   this.load_nucleus(name, function(){
      fn(); // Now continue.
   });
}

Element.prototype.load_nucleus(name, fn){
   fs.readFile(name+'.json', function(err, data) {
      this.nucleus = JSON.parse(data); 
      fn();
   });
}

var oxygen = new Element('oxygen', function(){  
   console.log(oxygen.nucleus);
});

Two, use EventEmitter to emit a 'loaded' event.

var Element = function Element(name){
   this.name = name;
   this.nucleus = {};

   this.load_nucleus(name); // This might take a second.
}

Element.prototype.load_nucleus(name){
   var self = this;
   fs.readFile(name+'.json', function(err, data) {
      self.nucleus = JSON.parse(data); 
      self.emit('loaded');
   });
}

util.inherits(Element, events.EventEmitter);

var oxygen = new Element('oxygen');
oxygen.once('loaded', function(){
   console.log(this.nucleus);
});

Or three, block the constructor.

var Element = function Element(name){
   this.name = name;
   this.nucleus = {};

   this.load_nucleus(name); // This might take a second.
}

Element.prototype.load_nucleus(name, fn){
   this.nucleus = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(name+'.json'));
}

var oxygen = new Element('oxygen');
console.log(oxygen.nucleus)

But I haven't seen any of this done before.

What other options do I have?

like image 316
Luke Burns Avatar asked Aug 08 '12 02:08

Luke Burns


People also ask

Can a constructor be asynchronous?

A simple answer for that: No, we can't! Currently, class constructors do not return types, and an asynchronous method should return a Task type.

Can we make constructor async in C#?

There is no simple way to make constructors async in C#, at least while keeping them as constructors. Constructors can't return a value in the . NET runtime. And the use cases for async constructors can be solved with factory methods that are async instead.

Can you await in constructor?

Since performing an asynchronous call to its completion in the constructor is not an option, we can still start a call in the constructor. We'd start it in the constructor, save the unsettled Promise in an instance variable, and then await for its completion in the methods that need it.

What is asynchronous function?

An asynchronous function is any function that delivers its result asynchronously – for example, a callback-based function or a Promise-based function. An async function is defined via special syntax, involving the keywords async and await . It is also called async/await due to these two keywords.


6 Answers

Update 2: Here is an updated example using an asynchronous factory method. N.B. this requires Node 8 or Babel if run in a browser.

class Element {
    constructor(nucleus){
        this.nucleus = nucleus;
    }

    static async createElement(){
        const nucleus = await this.loadNucleus();
        return new Element(nucleus);
    }

    static async loadNucleus(){
        // do something async here and return it
        return 10;
    }
}

async function main(){
    const element = await Element.createElement();
    // use your element
}

main();

Update: The code below got upvoted a couple of times. However I find this approach using a static method much better: https://stackoverflow.com/a/24686979/2124586

ES6 version using promises

class Element{
    constructor(){
        this.some_property = 5;
        this.nucleus;

        return new Promise((resolve) => {
            this.load_nucleus().then((nucleus) => {
                this.nucleus = nucleus;
                resolve(this);
            });
        });
    }

    load_nucleus(){
        return new Promise((resolve) => {
            setTimeout(() => resolve(10), 1000)
        });
    }
}

//Usage
new Element().then(function(instance){
    // do stuff with your instance
});
like image 192
tim Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 11:10

tim


Given the necessity to avoid blocking in Node, the use of events or callbacks isn't so strange(1).

With a slight edit of Two, you could merge it with One:

var Element = function Element(name, fn){
    this.name = name;
    this.nucleus = {};

    if (fn) this.on('loaded', fn);

    this.load_nucleus(name); // This might take a second.
}

...

Though, like the fs.readFile in your example, the core Node APIs (at least) often follow the pattern of static functions that expose the instance when the data is ready:

var Element = function Element(name, nucleus) {
    this.name = name;
    this.nucleus = nucleus;
};

Element.create = function (name, fn) {
    fs.readFile(name+'.json', function(err, data) {
        var nucleus = err ? null : JSON.parse(data);
        fn(err, new Element(name, nucleus));
    });
};

Element.create('oxygen', function (err, elem) {
    if (!err) {
        console.log(elem.name, elem.nucleus);
    }
});

(1) It shouldn't take very long to read a JSON file. If it is, perhaps a change in storage system is in order for the data.

like image 27
Jonathan Lonowski Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 11:10

Jonathan Lonowski


I have developed an async constructor:

function Myclass(){
 return (async () => {
     ... code here ...
     return this;
 })();
}

(async function() { 
 let s=await new Myclass();
 console.log("s",s)
})();
  • async returns a promise
  • arrow functions pass 'this' as is
  • it is possible to return something else when doing new (you still get a new empty object in this variable. if you call the function without new. you get the original this. like maybe window or global or its holding object).
  • it is possible to return the return value of called async function using await.
  • to use await in normal code, need to wrap the calls with an async anonymous function, that is called instantly. (the called function returns promise and code continues)

my 1st iteration was:

maybe just add a callback

call an anonymous async function, then call the callback.

function Myclass(cb){
 var asynccode=(async () => { 
     await this.something1();
     console.log(this.result)
 })();

 if(cb)
    asynccode.then(cb.bind(this))
}

my 2nd iteration was:

let's try with a promise instead of a callback. I thought to myself: strange a promise returning a promise, and it worked. .. so the next version is just a promise.

function Myclass(){
 this.result=false;
 var asynccode=(async () => {
     await new Promise (resolve => setTimeout (()=>{this.result="ok";resolve()}, 1000))
     console.log(this.result)
     return this;
 })();
 return asynccode;
}


(async function() { 
 let s=await new Myclass();
 console.log("s",s)
})();

callback-based for old javascript

function Myclass(cb){
 var that=this;
 var cb_wrap=function(data){that.data=data;cb(that)}
 getdata(cb_wrap)
}

new Myclass(function(s){

});
like image 21
Shimon Doodkin Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 09:10

Shimon Doodkin


One thing you could do is preload all the nuclei (maybe inefficient; I don't know how much data it is). The other, which I would recommend if preloading is not an option, would involve a callback with a cache to save loaded nuclei. Here is that approach:

Element.nuclei = {};

Element.prototype.load_nucleus = function(name, fn){
   if ( name in Element.nuclei ) {
       this.nucleus = Element.nuclei[name];
       return fn();
   }
   fs.readFile(name+'.json', function(err, data) {
      this.nucleus = Element.nuclei[name] = JSON.parse(data); 
      fn();
   });
}
like image 24
Will Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 10:10

Will


This is a bad code design.

The main problem is in the callback your instance it's not still execute the "return", this is what I mean

var MyClass = function(cb) {
  doAsync(function(err) {
    cb(err)
  }

  return {
    method1: function() { },
    method2: function() { }
  }
}

var _my = new MyClass(function(err) {
  console.log('instance', _my) // < _my is still undefined
  // _my.method1() can't run any methods from _my instance
})
_my.method1() // < it run the function, but it's not yet inited

So, the good code design is to explicitly call the "init" method (or in your case "load_nucleus") after instanced the class

var MyClass = function() {
  return {
    init: function(cb) {
      doAsync(function(err) {
        cb(err)
      }
    },
    method1: function() { },
    method2: function() { }
  }
}

var _my = new MyClass()
_my.init(function(err) { 
   if(err) {
     console.error('init error', err)
     return
   } 
   console.log('inited')
  // _my.method1()
})
like image 20
Simone Sanfratello Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 10:10

Simone Sanfratello


I extract out the async portions into a fluent method. By convention I call them together.

class FooBar {
  constructor() {
    this.foo = "foo";
  }
  
  async create() {
    this.bar = await bar();

    return this;
  }
}

async function bar() {
  return "bar";
}

async function main() {
  const foobar = await new FooBar().create(); // two-part constructor
  console.log(foobar.foo, foobar.bar);
}

main(); // foo bar

I tried a static factory approach wrapping new FooBar(), e.g. FooBar.create(), but it didn't play well with inheritance. If you extend FooBar into FooBarChild, FooBarChild.create() will still return a FooBar. Whereas with my approach new FooBarChild().create() will return a FooBarChild and it's easy to setup an inheritance chain with create().

like image 33
Bill Barnes Avatar answered Oct 02 '22 10:10

Bill Barnes