This is related to Checking that a List is not empty in Hamcrest
I have a question over that - If we can assert the list is not empty without using Hamcrest and just using JUnit as:
assertFalse(list.isEmpty());
Is using
assertThat(list.isEmpty(), is(false));
or
assertThat((Collection)list, is(not(empty())));
Worthwhile?
I'm not able to understand are we gaining something using Hamcrest version in this case? Are both equivalent?
We'll use the isEmpty method from the String class along with the Assert class from JUnit to verify whether a given String isn't empty. Since the isEmpty method returns true if the input String is empty we can use it together with the assertFalse method: assertFalse(text.
Set isEmpty() method in Java with Examples isEmpty() method is used to check if a Set is empty or not. It returns True if the Set is empty otherwise it returns False. Return Value: The method returns True if the set is empty else returns False.
Java String isEmpty() Method The isEmpty() method checks whether a string is empty or not. This method returns true if the string is empty (length() is 0), and false if not.
They are the same functionality. The hamcrest provides a more English-like readable language and better error messages. In simple cases like this, I would probably just use the assertFalse
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With